2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12041-017-0830-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

J. B. S. Haldane: the John Innes years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A part-time appointment at the John Innes Horticultural Institution from 1927 to 1937 brought Haldane into contact with the realities of plant breeding. Yet the encounter was not scientifically fruitful, with the mathematically inclined Haldane having ‘little in common with his colleagues’ working methods’ (Wilmot, 2017: 818–19). 7 During the 1930s, nutrition science saw a renewed drive to produce synthetic diets for laboratory animals (Landecker, 2016: 153).…”
Section: Artificiality and Substitutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A part-time appointment at the John Innes Horticultural Institution from 1927 to 1937 brought Haldane into contact with the realities of plant breeding. Yet the encounter was not scientifically fruitful, with the mathematically inclined Haldane having ‘little in common with his colleagues’ working methods’ (Wilmot, 2017: 818–19). 7 During the 1930s, nutrition science saw a renewed drive to produce synthetic diets for laboratory animals (Landecker, 2016: 153).…”
Section: Artificiality and Substitutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His contributions to science, largely in genetics and evolution, have also been the subject of multiple works (Adams, 2000;Fara, 2004;Sarkar, 1992a). We know that Haldane was directly involved in agriculture and breeding through the John Innes Horticultural Institution from 1927 to 1937 (Harman, 2004;Wilmot, 2017). He simultaneously clashed with the interwar Malthusian movement, which at the time was strongly associated with eugenics (Allen, 1991;Bashford, 2007;Chase, 1977;Connelly, 2008;Robertson, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%