Proceedings of the Eighth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3430895.3460982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

JackMarker with GitDown: A Framework to Counter Plagiarism at Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work exists in a nascent intersection of mature research communities. Some prior work has specifically investigated plagiarism at scale (Apoorv et al, 2020;Dahiya et al, 2021;Sheahen & Joyner, 2016), but the area as a whole is relatively young. However, several established areas of research touch on pertinent issues of academic integrity in online education.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This work exists in a nascent intersection of mature research communities. Some prior work has specifically investigated plagiarism at scale (Apoorv et al, 2020;Dahiya et al, 2021;Sheahen & Joyner, 2016), but the area as a whole is relatively young. However, several established areas of research touch on pertinent issues of academic integrity in online education.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a situation can arise when a student purchases unique content through contract cheating. More ambitious techniques to combat this form of cheatingsuch as comprehensive watermarking of student starter code and automated detection of requests for answers to sites like Cheggare currently under development (Dahiya et al, 2021;Graziano et al, 2019); once ready, they will be incorporated into this workflow to generate additional submissions to include in the batch of suspicious assignments for the Categorization workflow.…”
Section: Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An estimated 63% of universities in the United States are currently using digital proctoring, although this may include universities using more lightweight tools (such as lockdown browsers), and it does not show how prevalent such tools are within each university.3 | METHODOLOGYIn the Summer 2021 semester, we surveyed students and TAs in a large online computer science master's program about their familiarity with and attitudes towards digital proctoring software. Most students in the program tend to be mid-career professionals around the age of 30; significant research has already been performed on the program itself and its efforts to detect and deter academic misconduct(Apoorv et al, 2020;Dahiya et al, 2021;Graziano et al, 2019;Khazane et al, 2020;Mason et al, 2019;Sheahen & Joyner, 2016). The program employs many TAs who, in addition to grading assessments and answering student questions, often take an active role in course development and administration(Joyner, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%