2005
DOI: 10.3366/para.2005.28.1.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jacques Rancière and the Subversion of Mastery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In affirming the identity of the non-participant, those who employ this subject identity to talk about others -such as the interviewees in the present research -are engaged in an act of micro power that suppresses the capacity of some to speak within the field of cultural policy. Instead, their voices are easily co-opted by cultural professionals in order to affirm the status quo and manage cultural policy towards their own advantage (see Davis, 2010 andHallward, 2005 for a discussion of how some groups can co-opt the voices of others). Ultimately, anyone labeled as a cultural non-participant is denied the capacity to make a meaningful contribution to how cultural policy decisions are made.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In affirming the identity of the non-participant, those who employ this subject identity to talk about others -such as the interviewees in the present research -are engaged in an act of micro power that suppresses the capacity of some to speak within the field of cultural policy. Instead, their voices are easily co-opted by cultural professionals in order to affirm the status quo and manage cultural policy towards their own advantage (see Davis, 2010 andHallward, 2005 for a discussion of how some groups can co-opt the voices of others). Ultimately, anyone labeled as a cultural non-participant is denied the capacity to make a meaningful contribution to how cultural policy decisions are made.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. The concern of democracy is not with the formulation of agreement or the preservation of order but with the invention of new and hitherto unauthorised modes of disaggregation, disagreement and disorder’ (Hallward, 2005: 34–5). The politics of urban sustainability and the environment, therefore, in their populist postpolitical guise, are the antithesis of democracy and contribute to a further hollowing out of what, for Rancière and others, constitutes the very horizon of democracy as a radically heterogeneous and conflicting one.…”
Section: Democracy's Location: the Return Of The Polismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distinction between identification and subjectification therefore suggests that there are two ways in which individuals can speak—or perhaps we might say: can come to speech (see also Hallward, 2005, and Ruitenberg in this Issue). On the one hand we can speak within a particular distribution of the sensible.…”
Section: Speakermentioning
confidence: 99%