Four seminal studies published in 2005 showed that the classic Philadelphia-chromosome negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are characterized by a recurrent V617F point mutation in exon 14 of JAK2 [1]. This somatic mutation is found in the vast majority of patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and 60% of those with essential thrombocythemia (ET) or primary myelofibrosis (PMF). Virtually all patients with post-polycythemia vera (PPV-) and greater than 60% of patients with post-essential thrombocythemia (PET-) myelofibrosis are JAK2V617F mutated. Mitotic recombination of chromosome 9p is frequent in MPNs and leads to the copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH) for JAK2 that results in homozygosity for the mutated allele. In the minority of PV patients that do not carry JAK2V617F, other JAK2 mutations have been found in roughly half of cases, such as insertions or deletions in exon 12, and overall 99% of PV patients carry a mutation in JAK2. Amongst the 40% of patients with ET and MF that are JAK2V617F negative 3-5% carry mutations at codon 515 of the gene encoding the thrombopoietin receptor (MPL) and CN-LOH of chromosome 1p underlies the transition from heterozygous to homozygous MPLW515 mutations. Both JAK2 and MPL mutations are gain-of-function and promote the over-activation of STAT signaling largely mediated by abnormal and sustained phosphorylation of JAK2. Targeting activated JAK2 with JAK inhibitors is changing the therapeutic landscape of myelofibrosis, and the JAK2 and JAK1 inhibitor ruxolitinib has been approved as the first-in-class drug for the treatment of myelofibrosis; in addition, a number of phase II-III trials with different JAK2 inhibitors are ongoing in PV.The close association of JAK2V617F mutation with MPNs led to a revision of the WHO diagnostic criteria in 2008, where JAK2V617F and others closely related mutations, such as JAK2 exon 12 and MPLW515 mutations, were elected to represent new major diagnostic criteria for the three classic MPNs . Subsequent studies highlighted an unexpected complexity of the mutational landscape of MPNs with co-mutation of several other genes identified in up to 25-30% of the patients [1]. However, these mutations are not specific to MPNs as they are present in patients with other myeloid disorders such as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and acute leukemia. The spectrum of genes mutated involves epigenetic regulation (EZH2, ASXL1, TET2, DNMT3A, IDH1, and IDH2), the spliceosome (SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1) and rarer targets that disrupt JAK-STAT signalling (SH2B3/LNK). As a result of their distribution across myeloid malignancies they do not represent suitable diagnostic markers for classic MPNs but may find application for prognostic assessment, at least in PMF. However, the molecular complexity of MPNs is still far from being fully appreciated and other nonrecurrent mutations are expected to be discovered by application of deep sequencing approaches.
Calreticulin Mutations in MPN: Filling the GapThe "black box" tha...