2002
DOI: 10.4324/9780203011980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

James

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…With such a powerful paremiological outburst, it seems to me a paradox that only one other critic appears to have been drawn to comment on Okri's aphorisms. Historian, Richard Bauckham (2002), in his erudite survey of the aphorisms in the Epistle of James mentions Okri together with Francis Bacon, La Rochefaucault and Elias Canetti (2002: 109) as belonging to a major tradition of aphoristic writing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With such a powerful paremiological outburst, it seems to me a paradox that only one other critic appears to have been drawn to comment on Okri's aphorisms. Historian, Richard Bauckham (2002), in his erudite survey of the aphorisms in the Epistle of James mentions Okri together with Francis Bacon, La Rochefaucault and Elias Canetti (2002: 109) as belonging to a major tradition of aphoristic writing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Condemnation of double-mindedness (1:8; 4:8) refers the reader to the commandment to love God with all one's heart and soul. All of this is a clue to the text (2:14-16), where Shema is mentioned clearly (2: 19). James insists that one should not be confined to the correct proclamation of faith only -it must be followed by correct behavior.…”
Section: заключениеmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Экзегеты отмечали, что в Иак 1:2-27 автор касается тем, которые потом подробнее обсуждаются в гл. 2-5 19 . Этот раздел состоит из отдельных высказываний, связь между которыми не всегда понятна.…”
Section: благословения богаunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…36 Alternatively, Jas 2:14-26 has been viewed by others not as a response to Paul, but rather as these two authors speaking to their respective contexts and needs; in fact, in this view they are complementary. 37 The interpretation of Jas 1:22 as "Torah-doers," taking "word" as inferring the law, has only further exasperated perceived tensions between James and Paul. Therefore, the interpretation of Jas 1:22 has considerable importance in this larger debate about the relationship of James to Paul.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%