Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Wireless Security and Machine Learning 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3324921.3328788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jammer Detection based on Artificial Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deep learning has been studied to secure wireless communications, such as authenticating signals [37]- [39], detecting and classifying jammers of different types [40]- [42], and controlling communications to mitigate jamming effects [32], [40]. As cognitive radio capabilities are integrated into wireless communications, adversaries such as jammers become smarter, as well [40], [43].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning has been studied to secure wireless communications, such as authenticating signals [37]- [39], detecting and classifying jammers of different types [40]- [42], and controlling communications to mitigate jamming effects [32], [40]. As cognitive radio capabilities are integrated into wireless communications, adversaries such as jammers become smarter, as well [40], [43].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al, have proposed a CNN-based strategy named RFI-Net to detect interference in a five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Tele-scope (FAST) [14], that can outperform other techniques such as the U-Net model based on a CNN architecture, k-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithms, as well as Sum-Threshold. In [15], two DL-based strategies are used for jamming attack detection, namely deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) and deep recurrent neural networks (DRNN). In this research, two different jamming attacks, namely, classical wide-band barrage jamming and reference signal jamming have been analyzed [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, two different jamming attacks, namely, classical wide-band barrage jamming and reference signal jamming have been analyzed [15]. The results show that the classification accuracy reaches up to 86.1% under a realistic test environment [15]. In [16] three methods including a Convolutional Long Short-term Deep Neural Network (CLDNN), a Long Short-Term Memory neural network (LSTM), and a deep Residual Network (ResNet) have been proposed to recognize ten different modulation types.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they present different intentional JI with their respective targets, and conclude that a more complex jamming is likely to become a bigger threat due to increase in the sophistication of wireless systems. In [21], the authors investigate the jammer detection along with its types using different neural network approaches in an OFDMA-based signaling scenario. They show that their proposed approach can detect and classify the jamming attacks with 85% accuracy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. In [14,[21][22][23][24][25], different jamming techniques with their detection and mitigation methods are investigated in different networks. However, these studies lack the analysis of both ICI and JI in HetNets along with RFA.…”
Section: Approach and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%