2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/2151570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jamming Prediction for Radar Signals Using Machine Learning Methods

Abstract: Jamming is a form of electronic warfare where jammers radiate interfering signals toward an enemy radar, disrupting the receiver. The conventional method for determining an effective jamming technique corresponding to a threat signal is based on the library which stores the appropriate jamming method for signal types. However, there is a limit to the use of a library when a threat signal of a new type or a threat signal that has been altered differently from existing types is received. In this paper, we study … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The method can effectively detect and classify the jamming in the low-frequency SAR signals. Two methods of predicting the appropriate jamming technique for a received threat signal using deep learning are presented in [59]. Firstly, a DNN is used on feature values extracted manually from the pulse description width (PDW) list of the radar signal.…”
Section: A Ew -Application Specific Ai Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method can effectively detect and classify the jamming in the low-frequency SAR signals. Two methods of predicting the appropriate jamming technique for a received threat signal using deep learning are presented in [59]. Firstly, a DNN is used on feature values extracted manually from the pulse description width (PDW) list of the radar signal.…”
Section: A Ew -Application Specific Ai Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LSTM is mainly used to solve the timing prediction problem because it can predict the state of the next moment based on the state of the data at the previous moment. Hence, it can be used for radar signal processing and for predicting the appropriate jamming technique [59]. 4) Deep reinforcement learning (DRL): Reinforcement learning is an area of machine learning that is used for taking suitable action to maximize the reward in a particular situation.…”
Section: A Ew -Application Specific Ai Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ ˆ ์ด๋‹ค ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ์ดˆ๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ์‚ฌ์ „์— ๊ตฌ์ถ•๋œ ์‹  ํ˜ธ ์ •๋ณด์˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ–ˆ์ง€๋งŒ [3] , ์ตœ๊ทผ์— ์‹ฌ์ธตํ•™ ์Šต์„ ์ ์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์ด ์ œ์‹œ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์‹ฌ์ธตํ•™์Šต์€ CNN (convolutional neural network) [4]๏ฝž [7] ๋˜๋Š” LSTM(long shortterm memory) ๋ชจ๋ธ [1], [8] ์„ ์ฃผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ PRI, RF, PW ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„์™€ ๋ณ€ํ™” ํ˜•ํƒœ์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ํŽ„์Šค ๋ ˆ์ด๋‹ค ์‹ ํ˜ธ์˜ ํŠน์ง•๋ณ„๋กœ ์ˆ˜๏ฝž์ˆ˜์‹ญ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ•œํŽธ, ์ฐธ๊ณ  ๋ฌธํ—Œ [9]์—์„œ๋Š” ํŽ„์Šค ๋ ˆ์ด๋‹ค ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํŽ„์Šค ์‹ ํ˜ธ์˜ ์ฃผ์š”ํ•œ ํŠน์„ฑ์ธ ๋ฌด์„ ์ฃผํŒŒ์ˆ˜์™€ ํŽ„์Šค ๋ฐ˜๋ณต ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ ์ธ ๋ณ€ํ™” ํ˜•ํƒœ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ๊ฐ 7๊ฐ€์ง€, 8๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•˜๊ณ , ๋ณ€ ํ™” ํ˜•ํƒœ๋ณ„๋กœ ์†์„ฑ์„ ์ •์˜ํ•œ ํ›„, LSTM์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณ€ํ™” ํ˜•ํƒœ์™€ ์†์„ฑ์„ ์‹๋ณ„ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.…”
unclassified
“…The trained classifier from Problem 5 was tested using the simulated single LFM pulse using the parameters given in Table 13. Classification results are shown in Figures 39,40,41,42,43,and 44. Since the parameters are not close to the realistic parameters, the classifiers are not expected to perform perfectly even at high SNR.…”
Section: Problem 6: Robustness Of the Classifiers Against Windowing Imperfectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al [43] investigated jamming prediction for radar signals using a combination of ML classifiers (SVM, NN, and RF) to perform feature extraction and classify the signals. They obtained an accuracy of 98.46% for NN with extracted features, but 99.36% for LSTM without feature extraction.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%