Jane Seager's Sibylline Poems: Maidenly Negotiations Through                     Elizabethan Gift Exchange [with text]

Malay, Jessica L.

doi:10.1111/j.1475-6757.2006.076_1.x

Cited by 8 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the aftermath of the near-catastrophe with Mary, who had in her possession 'tables of sixty or so ciphers' when her belongings were confiscated before her 1586 trial (Guy 470), Jane Seager offers herself as Elizabeth's codemaker and code-breaker in a 1589 New Year's gift, an elaborately hand-colored manuscript entitled The Divine Prophesies of the Ten Sibills, now in The British Library. Jessica Malay argues convincingly that Seager's source for Barbieri's text was Sebastion Castalioni's Sibyllinorum Oracularum, written in Latin and published in 1544, 18 but Seager's prophecies are also accompanied by a translation into Dr. Timothy Bright's 'rare Arte of Charactery', a code whereby letters of the alphabet were assigned a special character and words formed by 'means of a variety of hooks and/or by changing the position of the initial character'. 19 Seager's secrets, transcribed this way, are explicitly linked, in fact, to the blessing the Virgin Mary carried, for Seager details a sacred birth which 'shall remove the worldes obscurity: / Unfoulding all the Prophets prophecies/And knotty volumes of the Jewish race' ('Samia' ll.…”

mentioning

confidence: 95%

The Renaissance Englishwoman in Code: Blabbs and Cryptographers at Elizabeth I's Court

Mazzola¹

2010

Critical Survey

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this essay I argue that the marginalisation of women's work in the early modern period was, sometimes, an enabling condition. Shakespeare's Bianca converses with her lover in a secret language, and Mary Stuart similarly smuggles letters out of prison to her supporters in code, trying to circumvent Elizabeth's spies and cryptographers. Women writers did not always seek to circulate their words or see them in print, in other words, and what looks like illiteracy on the part of women -poor spelling or garbled syntax or a crabbed penmanship -may instead mark a skillful command of letters, a dazzling 'high' literacy which rivals Latin learning, and occasionally disables it. Many women at Elizabeth's court during the years of Mary Stuart's intriguing display a similar expertise in cryptography. I also explore Jane Seager's 1589 New Year's gift to Elizabeth as well as some of Elizabeth's speeches about Mary Stuart as evidence that early modern women writers might represent themselves as practitioners of secret knowledge, disdaining publication, courting misreading.The great number of noble women at that time in England [were] given to the study of devout science and of strange tongues. It was a common thing to see young virgins so nouzled and trained in the study of letters, that they willingly set all other pastimes at nought for learning sake. 1

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 95%