2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.119.188901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Janićević et al. Reply:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fitting these values to Eq.2 yields σ c = 0.84 ± 0.06, a = 1.97 ± 0.05, and b = 0.24 ± 0.03. It is satisfying that the values of σ c obtained by the two methods are reasonably close to each other and also close to the estimate σ c = 0.85 ± 0.02 obtained in reference [14] by studying large systems of size up to L = 65536. Simulations presented in Fig.4 demonstrate the existence of critical hysteresis on a triangular lattice.…”
Section: The Model and Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Fitting these values to Eq.2 yields σ c = 0.84 ± 0.06, a = 1.97 ± 0.05, and b = 0.24 ± 0.03. It is satisfying that the values of σ c obtained by the two methods are reasonably close to each other and also close to the estimate σ c = 0.85 ± 0.02 obtained in reference [14] by studying large systems of size up to L = 65536. Simulations presented in Fig.4 demonstrate the existence of critical hysteresis on a triangular lattice.…”
Section: The Model and Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However numerical uncertainties are large and diminish extremely slowly with increasing system size. As mentioned earlier, initial studies on triangular lattices of sizes L × L with L ≤ 600 indicated σ c = 1.22 [15] but more extensive simulations on lattices up to L = 65536 yield σ c = 0.85 [14]. The procedure for determining σ c is rather indirect, tedious, cpu intensive, and various compromises have to be made in order to draw reasonable conclusions [15].…”
Section: The Model and Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One of the standard propositions to define avalanches is to threshold the global velocity signal. However this kind of analysis raises important issues : If the threshold is too large, a single avalanche may be interpreted as a series of seemingly distinct events, while if it is too small subsequent avalanches can be merged into a single event [9][10][11][12]. Hence disentangling avalanches becomes nearly impossible and accurately measuring critical exponents is then particularly challenging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%