Janus’ Voice: Religious Leaders, Framing, and Riots in Kano

Abstract

This article analyses the role of religious leaders in collective violence in Kano, the major urban centre in northern Nigeria. It compares two episodes of collective action in the city-the violent 'Plateau riots' in 2004 and the non-violent 'cartoon protests' in 2006-to explore the role of religious leaders in the variation in violence between the two events. The core argument is that the ways in which Islamic and Christian preachers framed the triggering events for these cases facilitated different forms of mobilisation and enemy identification in response. In 2004, the interpretation of violence in Plateau State through the 'Christiansversus-Muslims' frame allowed for mobilisation within Kano's Christian and Muslim communities as well as for the identification of local Christians as enemies. In 2006, in contrast, the infamous Danish cartoons were actively framed as part of the global struggle between faithful Nigerians and nonreligious Westerners, facilitating non-violent mobilisation across Christian-Muslim boundaries. Thus, the divergent discursive strategies employed by religious leaders are likely to have contributed to violent escalation in 2004 and to peaceful mobilisation in 2006. At the same time, however, the article emphasises the interaction of discursive framing with other factors, such as the role of security forces and the inextricable connections between religious and political authorities in Kano. The article is based on mixed-methods data collected in Kano between 2006 and 2012, including perceptions survey data, semi-structured interviews, and newspaper articles.

The intention of religious leaders to use Islamic banking services: the case of Indonesia

“…According to Ter Haar and Ellis (2006), religion plays a role in determining the strategic development of society, with the assistance of religious leaders. Ehrhardt (2016) defined religious figures are people that play a specific and dominant role in the development of communities. According to Scheitle et al (2018) and Samuel and Pandey (2018), religious leaders possess special characteristics such as credibility, unique influence on values shared with the community, understanding the local context, with a wide network and access to various sources of community power.…”

The paradox of co‐producing governance with traditional institutions: Diaspora chiefs and minority empowerment in Nigeria

“…To better understand these dynamics, I use Kano metropolis as a most-likely case for the positive impacts of diaspora chiefs. Past studies have consistently shown the legitimacy and influence of the Kano's traditional authorities (Ehrhardt, 2012(Ehrhardt, , 2016; moreover, these institutions have a long history of effectively integrating 'settler' communities, and some of the country's oldest and most established systems of diaspora chieftaincy (Ehrhardt, 2012). Furthermore, 'settler' communities in Kano have strong organisations, and their diaspora chiefs are deemed to be closely connected to their communities.…”

Agents of order? Brokerage and empowerment in development and conflict

“…Moreover, the relationship between the two social groups between which brokers mediate tends to be marked by power inequalities, which places brokers in an even more 'liminal' position with fragile relations of trust, loyalty and dependency (Hinderaker, 2002, p. 359). This inherently 'Janus-faced' position has been remarked upon repeatedly in relation to brokers (Aspinall, 2014;de Jong, 2018;Ehrhardt, 2016;Hinderaker, 2002;Kern & Müller-Böker., 2015), not only because it helps to explain the precariousness that often characterises their position but also because it raises the question of who benefits from their brokerage.…”