Japan Decides 2021 2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-11324-6_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Japan’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the accumulating evidence showed that COVID-19-related restrictions have negatively affected children’s PF, including CRF [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ], to date, no study has examined the changes in geographical disparity in CRF among children and adolescents during the pandemic. Importantly, there were substantial differences in the magnitude of COVID-19-related restrictions across the prefectures, depending on the local infection status [ 13 , 14 , 15 ]. This ecological study was the first to demonstrate significant relationships between the magnitude of infections (evaluated as the number of confirmed cases) and changes in CRF at the prefecture level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the accumulating evidence showed that COVID-19-related restrictions have negatively affected children’s PF, including CRF [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ], to date, no study has examined the changes in geographical disparity in CRF among children and adolescents during the pandemic. Importantly, there were substantial differences in the magnitude of COVID-19-related restrictions across the prefectures, depending on the local infection status [ 13 , 14 , 15 ]. This ecological study was the first to demonstrate significant relationships between the magnitude of infections (evaluated as the number of confirmed cases) and changes in CRF at the prefecture level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although all children across Japan experienced a series of pandemic-related restrictions (e.g., stay-home and cancellation and restrictions of sporting events and organized sports participation), the extent of restrictions differed based on the geographical area of residence. Overall, children who resided in areas with the highest number of infections encountered maximum movement restrictions [ 13 , 14 , 15 ]. This is because local governments (i.e., prefectural governors), instead of central governments, played an important role in controlling the number of infected individuals based on their local conditions (e.g., the number of infected people in the prefecture) [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This agenda is not novel in its ambition; Phillip Lipscy has recently proposed a general agenda to study the politics of international crisis. 64 His proposal critiques extant approaches to IPE, which resemble mid-range theories, for ignoring crises and focusing on routine relationships, such as trade. He suggests that scholars ought to combine international security's emphasis on critical events with the strengths of IPE to better understand the politics of crisis.…”
Section: An Agenda For Studying Race and International Crisesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it was these countries that were searched on Google Scholar using the following parameters in late March: "Wave 4 [country name] COVID-19 vaccine perceived limitation". The results of that search are provided in Table 2: Iran, vaccine acceptance rate was 70% in conjunction with a high death rate from COVID-19 although progress in vaccination was slow [102]; Japan was relatively late in beginning its vaccination campaign, hindered by supply and bureaucratic problems resulting in challenges with procurement and distribution, but not by vaccines hesitancy [103]; in the United Kingdom, there was a significant decrease in vaccine acceptance in comparison with Wave 3 with speed, safety, efficacy, and quality control as key reasons for concern about receiving a vaccine [98].…”
Section: Post-vaccinementioning
confidence: 99%