Quality and Inequality of Education 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3993-4_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Japanese and Korean High Schools and Students in Comparative Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the results of the problem-solving test offered by PISA beginning with 2003 (Park, 2006) which requires a creative search for solutions, shows that, on the contrary, the East-Asian type of education represents one of the best methods of training for this type of exercise. Our hypothesis is that the weakness of the East-Asian model is, to a great extent, the result of the pressure placed on students for the entry into high school and university, which orientates school work toward cramming and training for the exam papers and which limits the meaning of achievement to the contest success.…”
Section: Results: the Pisa Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results of the problem-solving test offered by PISA beginning with 2003 (Park, 2006) which requires a creative search for solutions, shows that, on the contrary, the East-Asian type of education represents one of the best methods of training for this type of exercise. Our hypothesis is that the weakness of the East-Asian model is, to a great extent, the result of the pressure placed on students for the entry into high school and university, which orientates school work toward cramming and training for the exam papers and which limits the meaning of achievement to the contest success.…”
Section: Results: the Pisa Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Private schools are also subject to the random assignment of students. Therefore, students attending private and public schools do not differ significantly in terms of socioeconomic background (Park 2010). The Korean government also imposes uniform curriculum and tuition on public and private schools.…”
Section: Random Assignment To Seoul Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned earlier, because private schools are subject to the same random assignment as public schools, and the Korean government imposes uniform curriculum and tuition on public and private schools, the differences between public and private schools in Korea are not as marked as in other countries, especially with regard to factors that may possibly influence students’ BMI. Park (2010) finds that students attending private and public high schools do not differ significantly in terms of socioeconomic backgrounds. One possibly relevant difference between private schools and public schools is the gender composition of teachers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%