2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-022-01753-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jasmine and Iris: population-scale structural variant comparison and analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The three SV sets were then merged together using Jasmine version 1.1.5 (Kirsche et al., 2023), which integrates various information including chromosome, position, end, size and type to determine whether SV calls from different files or samples refer to the same SV or not. We ran Jasmine with parameters “‐‐mutual_distance ‐‐max_dist_linear = 0.25”, so that the maximum allowed distance required between two SVs for them to be merged is correlated with their size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The three SV sets were then merged together using Jasmine version 1.1.5 (Kirsche et al., 2023), which integrates various information including chromosome, position, end, size and type to determine whether SV calls from different files or samples refer to the same SV or not. We ran Jasmine with parameters “‐‐mutual_distance ‐‐max_dist_linear = 0.25”, so that the maximum allowed distance required between two SVs for them to be merged is correlated with their size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We ran Sniffles 2.0.7 (Sedlazeck, Rescheneder, et al., 2018; Smolka et al., 2022) (default settings and “‐‐output‐rnames ‐‐combine‐consensus” options) on each sample and filtered for PASS and PRECISE calls. We then refined alternate allele sequences and breakpoints for insertions, deletions and some duplications by running Iris (Kirsche et al., 2023): we first preprocessed each sample's VCF with Jasmine (“‐‐dup_to_ins ‐‐preprocess_only”), and ran Iris with parameters “‐‐keep_long_variants ‐‐also_deletions”. The four samples' refined VCFs were merged together using Jasmine ‐‐ignore_strand ‐‐mutual_distance ‐‐allow_intrasample ‐‐output_genotypes, and refined SVs were then converted back to their original type with Jasmine ‐‐dup_to_ins ‐‐postprocess_only.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prove the validity of our somatic INSs, we collected all available long-read whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data (generated on the ONT platform) from the 1000 Genomes Project [37] and identified insertions and duplications using Sniffles. We also downloaded a germline SV dataset (generated on the ONT platform) from 405 unrelated healthy Chinese individuals [89]. The SVs from the two projects were pooled together to be employed as an ONT platform-based ‘Panel of Normals (PONs)’.…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We, therefore, developed a new comparison tool called Minda, which is agnostic to SV types and is better suited for analysis of somatic SVs represented as junctions. Minda can also be used for multiway call sets comparison and merging (Jeffares et al 2017;Kirsche et al 2023). Benchmarking long-read tools using the GIAB HG002 germline SV set.…”
Section: Overview Of the Severus Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%