JD.com: leveraging the edge of e-business

Abstract

Subject area E-Business; Corporate Strategy; Strategic Management; Operation Management. Study level/applicability Senior undergraduate; MBA; EMBA. Case overview After development for 10 years, JD was now China’s second largest business-to-customer (B2C) e-retailer and the largest in self-operated sector. It was September 2015 when Liu Qiangdong was deciding whether to persist with JD’s self-operated model and the heavy investment in the self-built logistics system. JD’s business model had been functioning well. However, as JD grew bigger and bigger, it became too expensive to expand its logistics system. JD had not made a profit since it raised funds from investors. Liu had to come up with a good proposal before the next monthly meeting to convince them that JD would finally overtake its biggest rival, Alibaba which ran on a different business model. In addition, JD was exploiting the rural and the global markets, as well as a new business in internet finance. Facing challenges and dilemmas, should JD persist with its model? How could Liu align short-term profitability with long-run development? How could JD overcome attacks from Alibaba and other competitors? Expected learning outcomes This case is appropriate for courses in e-business and strategy, particularly those with a strong focus on doing e-business in emerging markets (e.g. China). After studying the case, students should be able to: understand the e-commerce market in China; understand business models and key strategies of e-retailers; identify and analyse the pros and cons of the self-operated business model and self-built logistics system in e-commerce; learn how to evaluate performance, strategies and business models of e-commerce companies; and extract key trends in the market and compare different strategies. Supplementary materials Teaching notes are available for educators only. Please contact your library to gain login details or email support@emeraldinsight.com to request teaching notes. Subject code: CSS 11: Strategy.

The organizational collaboration framework of smart logistics ecological chain: a multi-case study in China

“…Take the ecological chain of JD Logistics as an example. JD Logistics empowers supply and demand ecological groups through the smart platform (Chan et al, 2018). Specifically, for supply ecological group, the smart platform can not only allocate orders for logistics providers according to different service levels but also provide accurate suggestions for their service improvement.…”

Exploring the factors to promote circular supply chain implementation in the smart logistics ecological chain

“…In addition, JD Logistics realized the complementarity of resources such as smart logistics facilities, business operations, consumers' data, and information systems by connecting various supply chain members. It also empowers supply and demand ecological groups with intelligent technologies through a smart platform (Chan et al, 2018). Nowadays, an increasing number of companies have paid more attention to develop comprehensive understandings of SLEC (Liu et al, 2021a).…”

Choice of cooperation strategy under demand updating and altruistic behavior

“…Through the application and innovation of digital technology, JD logistics has realized the enabling of logistics service providers. Logistics service providers can rely on JD's big data platform to deeply explore the value development points existing in the supply chain and bring efficient logistics services to customers [ 11 ].…”