2022
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-022-07002-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jerk Optimized Motion Planning of Redundant Space Robot Based on Grey-Wolf Optimization Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To verify the effectiveness of the suggested approach, the damped least square (DLS) and model predictive control (MPC) methods [47][48][49] Validation with damped least square method Figure 15 depicts the variation in end-effector position over time using the proposed method and DLS methods. By using the suggested method in this case, the deviation between the straight-line path and polynomial blend is 4°, whereas it is 12°when using the DLS method.…”
Section: Validation Of Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To verify the effectiveness of the suggested approach, the damped least square (DLS) and model predictive control (MPC) methods [47][48][49] Validation with damped least square method Figure 15 depicts the variation in end-effector position over time using the proposed method and DLS methods. By using the suggested method in this case, the deviation between the straight-line path and polynomial blend is 4°, whereas it is 12°when using the DLS method.…”
Section: Validation Of Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify the effectiveness of the suggested approach, the damped least square (DLS) and model predictive control (MPC) methods 4749 are applied. The robot is acquired in order to change the starting base attitude [ α , β , γ ] s = ( 0 . 0 , 0 . 0 , 0 . 0 ) ° to the desired base attitude [ α , β , γ ] d = ( 6 . 0 , 6 . 0 , 8 . 0 ) ° and desired end-effector attitude quaternion is [ v e , 0.25em p e 1 , 0.25em p e 2 , 0.25em p e 3 ] = [0.1220, 0.029, 0.028, 0.082] m. Where, [ v e ] signifies quaternion agreeing to rotation frame, [ p e 1 , p e 2 , p e 3 ] represent quaternion conforming to position frame, …”
Section: Validation Of Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is observed that trajectory planning solely based on the robot's task goals and functional realization lacks rigor and necessitates consideration of factors related to trajectory quality assessment. Among these factors, efficiency (Singh & Banga, 2022; Wang, Wu, et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2022), energy consumption (Jiang et al, 2023; Li et al, 2022; Ren et al, 2023), and operational smoothness (Lin, 2014; Shrivastava & Dalla, 2022) stand out as the most prominent factors (Gasparetto et al, 2015). Efficiency and smoothness of industrial robots are two conflicting factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The planned trajectory is smoother, but the convergence speed is slower. Shrivastava et al [29] calculated the jerk-optimized trajectory of a redundant manipulator with the gray wolf optimizer. The approach can generate a minimal difference in the joint trajectory to guarantee joint stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%