1969
DOI: 10.1080/00022470.1969.10469348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jet Aircraft: A Growing Pollution Source

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fuel burn under the TRS might be expected to increase at all altitudes up to 9.2 km with increasing mission distance and mission times, but turboprop‐equipped aircraft require significantly less runway for takeoff and landing than turbofan powered aircraft of the same size [ SKYbrary , ] resulting in decreases of fuel burn at the lowest model layer. Emissions of CO 2 , CO, H 2 O, HC, SO x , and NO x decrease at the majority of the altitudes (see Figure ) because of their decreased emissions from efficient turboprop aircraft engine technology within the combustor compared with that of turbofan engines [ George et al ., ]. At ground level, emissions of CO and NO x decrease by 33 and 29%, respectively, on average between 2005 and 2011.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fuel burn under the TRS might be expected to increase at all altitudes up to 9.2 km with increasing mission distance and mission times, but turboprop‐equipped aircraft require significantly less runway for takeoff and landing than turbofan powered aircraft of the same size [ SKYbrary , ] resulting in decreases of fuel burn at the lowest model layer. Emissions of CO 2 , CO, H 2 O, HC, SO x , and NO x decrease at the majority of the altitudes (see Figure ) because of their decreased emissions from efficient turboprop aircraft engine technology within the combustor compared with that of turbofan engines [ George et al ., ]. At ground level, emissions of CO and NO x decrease by 33 and 29%, respectively, on average between 2005 and 2011.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fallout from these facilities is an additional problem. Although the particulate size ranges from 0.01 to 1 /un, 1 with an average of 0.1 /im, 2 agglomeration does occur 3 and fallout problems exist within a 1 mile radius of the installation. The quantity of fallout is of the order of 600-1000 lb/day for a 17,000 lb thrust engine or 40 Mw peak power unit.…”
Section: A J Tellermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For PM removal from the emissions of various types of engines including air breathing engines, there are a number of devices such as filters, cyclones, nonthermal plasma and electrostatic precipitators (Babaie et al, 2015;Takasaki et al, 2015;Tian & Ahmadi, 2007;Tu et al, 2012;Zheng et al, 2004;Zhou et al, 2017). Gas turbine engines are a source of PM emissions with diameters less than 2.5 microns, which are subject to regulation under the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (George et al, 1969). Effective pollution control of gas turbine engines has been a major concern in the design of modern aircraft propulsion systems (Schnelle et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%