2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.96.072002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jet energy scale measurements and their systematic uncertainties in proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV with the ATLAS detector

Abstract: Jet energy scale measurements and their systematic uncertainties are reported for jets measured with the ATLAS detector using proton-proton collision data with a center-of-mass energy of ffiffi ffi s p ¼ 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 3.2 fb −1 collected during 2015 at the LHC. Jets are reconstructed from energy deposits forming topological clusters of calorimeter cells, using the anti-k t algorithm with radius parameter R ¼ 0.4. Jets are calibrated with a series of simulation-based corre… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
170
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
170
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data and MC simulations agree well (see Fig. 6), the jet energy scale is consistent [7] with MC predictions, and the jet energy resolution is below 10% for p T >100 GeV. The constant term agree with the expected value of 3%.…”
Section: Performancesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The data and MC simulations agree well (see Fig. 6), the jet energy scale is consistent [7] with MC predictions, and the jet energy resolution is below 10% for p T >100 GeV. The constant term agree with the expected value of 3%.…”
Section: Performancesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Their calibration is based on simulation with additional corrections obtained using in situ techniques [86] to account for differences between simulation and data. Jets are required to satisfy p T > 25 GeV and jηj < 2.5.…”
Section: Object Reconstruction and Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total jet uncertainty varies from 1.0% to 5.5% depending on the jet p T . The largest impact of experimental uncertainties on the signal strength μ ¼ σ ttH;obs =σ ttH;SM arises from the jet energy scale, in particular, contributions from the different responses to quark and gluon jets, pileup subtraction, and in situ calibration in data [86].…”
Section: Systematic Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of multiple interactions per proton bunch crossing (pileup) is accounted for using the jet area method [81,82]. Subsequent calibrations are applied to the reconstructed jet to improve the energy resolution [83,84]. The residual contamination by pileup jets is further suppressed using a multivariate discriminant that estimates the compatibility of the jet with the PV, as detailed in Ref.…”
Section: Event Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%