2005
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jet flow in steadily swimming adult squid

Abstract: SUMMARY Although various hydrodynamic models have been used in past analyses of squid jet propulsion, no previous investigations have definitively determined the fluid structure of the jets of steadily swimming squid. In addition, few accurate measurements of jet velocity and other jet parameters in squid have been reported. We used digital particle imaging velocimetry (DPIV) to visualize the jet flow of adult long-finned squid Loligo pealei(mantle length, Lm=27.1±3.0 cm, mean ± s.d.) swimming i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
155
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
13
155
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our model for the propelling jet flow was also greatly simplified, prescribing a constant-magnitude uniform-profile jet and not solving for the internal cavity flow. Hence no attention was paid to optimizing the jet flow, an important problem in itself (Linden & Turner 2004;Anderson & Grosenbaugh 2005;Bartol et al 2009;Moslemi & Krueger 2011). Also, there is a connection of the present work to the hydrodynamics of medusae (Dabiri, Colin & Costello 2006), particularly when the mode of 'umbrella' deflation G. D. Weymouth and M. S. Triantafyllou is assumed; for this problem, the interaction of the flow around the body with the jet flow is significant, and could provide further, potentially beneficial, effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Our model for the propelling jet flow was also greatly simplified, prescribing a constant-magnitude uniform-profile jet and not solving for the internal cavity flow. Hence no attention was paid to optimizing the jet flow, an important problem in itself (Linden & Turner 2004;Anderson & Grosenbaugh 2005;Bartol et al 2009;Moslemi & Krueger 2011). Also, there is a connection of the present work to the hydrodynamics of medusae (Dabiri, Colin & Costello 2006), particularly when the mode of 'umbrella' deflation G. D. Weymouth and M. S. Triantafyllou is assumed; for this problem, the interaction of the flow around the body with the jet flow is significant, and could provide further, potentially beneficial, effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This vehicle weighs 335 g, has a mantle maximum extension in the axial direction of 16 cm and a mantle capacity of 35 ml, was found [32] coincident with the peak of swimming efficiency. As for the Octopus vulgaris, i.e., the common octopus, specimen are found to grow to a mantle length of about 25 cm and swim at an average speed of 0.18 m/s, which is 0.7 bdl/s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ranges extend well above 3.6-4.5 and since co-flow reduces optimum F, squid jet events are frequently elongated plugs of fluid rather than discrete vortex rings (Anderson and Grosenbaugh 2005). Variation in jet diameter by Nemiopsis bachei , a cnidarian jellyfish species that swims by jet propulsion, led to a maximum F of around 8, and vortex ring pinch-off never occurred (Dabiri et al 2006).…”
Section: Aspects Of Salp Jet Wake Structurementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Pipe jet experiments and studies with jet-propelled organisms have shown that the optimum F can be affected by at least two phenomena: 1) background co-flow can lower the optimum F due to early pinch-off or inhibition of vortex rings, leading to elongated jets with weak or absent vortex rings (Anderson and Grosenbaugh 2005) and 2) variation in jet diameter and/or jet velocity can delay pinch off . The jets of steadily swimming squid, which always experience co-flow due to flow past the squid occur at formation numbers of F = 5.5-61.8 (adult Loligo pealei) and F = 3.23-23.19 (juvenile and adult Lolliguncula brevis) Grosenbaugh 2005, Bartol et al 2009).…”
Section: Aspects Of Salp Jet Wake Structurementioning
confidence: 99%