1999
DOI: 10.1086/312305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jet-induced Explosions of Core Collapse Supernovae

Abstract: We numerically studied the explosion of a supernova caused by supersonic jets present in its center. The jets are assumed to be generated by a magneto-rotational mechanism when a stellar core collapses into a neutron star. We simulated the process of the jet propagation through the star, jet breakthrough, and the ejection of the supernova envelope by the lateral shocks generated during jet propagation. The end result of the interaction is a highly nonspherical supernova explosion with two high-velocity jets of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
375
2
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 334 publications
(392 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(26 reference statements)
14
375
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, Maund et al (2007b) inferred spherical configurations for the LV line-forming regions for SN 2005bf. In addition, although the jet-torus paradigm (Khokhlov et al 1999) has been invoked to explain spectropolarimetric observations of some stripped CCSNe (Tanaka et al 2008), we can exclude a torus-like line-forming region for the LV components as we do not observe the high levels of polarisation predicted for such a geometry (Kasen et al 2003).…”
Section: Complex Multi-axis Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously, Maund et al (2007b) inferred spherical configurations for the LV line-forming regions for SN 2005bf. In addition, although the jet-torus paradigm (Khokhlov et al 1999) has been invoked to explain spectropolarimetric observations of some stripped CCSNe (Tanaka et al 2008), we can exclude a torus-like line-forming region for the LV components as we do not observe the high levels of polarisation predicted for such a geometry (Kasen et al 2003).…”
Section: Complex Multi-axis Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In this model a jet, originating either from asymmetric neutrino emission (Blondin & Mezzacappa 2007) or the magneto-rotational mechanism (LeBlanc & Wilson 1970;Mikami et al 2008), would carry heavy elements in bipolar flows, while low and intermediate mass elements (e.g. helium and oxygen) would form a torus in the equatorial plane (Khokhlov et al 1999;Khokhlov & Höflich 2001;Maeda et al 2002). We observed no such segregation between the locations of heavier mass (iron and calcium) and lower mass (helium and oxygen) elements in the ejecta, that would suggest such a geometric configuration for iPTF 13bvn.…”
Section: Implications For the Explosion Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the otherhand, if rotation indeed plays a dynamically important role, the basic collapse and explosion may be qualitatively different (e.g., core bounce may occur at subnuclear density, the explosion is weaker and takes the form of two-sided jets (e.g. Khokhlov et al 1999;Fryer & Heger 2000). The possibility of a kick in such systems has not been studied, but it is conceivable that an asymmetric dipolar perturbation may be coupled to rotation, thus producing spin-kick alignment.…”
Section: Astrophysical Constraints On Kick Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For discussions of the role of general relativity, rotation, and magnetic fields in supernova models, the reader may begin with the papers by Bruenn et al [18], Liebendörfer et al [19], [20], Fryer and Heger [9], Khokhlov et al [10], and MacFadyen and Woosley [21].…”
Section: General Relativity Rotation and Magnetic Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heating is mediated primarily by the absorption of electron neutrinos and antineutrinos on the dissociation-liberated nucleons behind the shock. This past decade has also seen the emergence of multidimensional supernova models, which have investigated the role convection, rotation, and magnetic fields may play in the explosion [4][5][6][7][8][9][10], in some cases invoking new explosion paradigms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%