2015
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/218/1/12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jet Luminosity of Gamma-Ray Bursts: The Blandford–znajek Mechanism Versus the Neutrino Annihilation Process

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those are summarized in the left panel of Figure 3 (adapted from Figure 20 in Liu et al (2017)): First, almost all SGRBs might be described in the NDAF model, with reasonable disk masses derived from the remanent of the compact objects mergers (Liu et al 2015c); Second, only about half of LGRBs might satisfy the NDAF model, while it might be necessary for the left half to introduce massive disks, extreme Kerr BHs, and high conversion efficiency for neutrino annihilation (Song et al 2016); Third, for LGRBs and ULGRBs, BZ mechanism is especially more efficient than NDAFs. Actually, the deviation between BZ mechanism and NDAFs is more significant if X-ray flares are included 1 (e.g., Liu et al 2015b;Luo et al 2013;Mu et al 2016); Fourth, the millisecond magnetar model could cover almost all types of GRBs as said before. Cutler & Thorne (2002) reviewed the estimations for the event rates and the GW strengths of the well-known GW sources including NSs.…”
Section: Magnetarsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Those are summarized in the left panel of Figure 3 (adapted from Figure 20 in Liu et al (2017)): First, almost all SGRBs might be described in the NDAF model, with reasonable disk masses derived from the remanent of the compact objects mergers (Liu et al 2015c); Second, only about half of LGRBs might satisfy the NDAF model, while it might be necessary for the left half to introduce massive disks, extreme Kerr BHs, and high conversion efficiency for neutrino annihilation (Song et al 2016); Third, for LGRBs and ULGRBs, BZ mechanism is especially more efficient than NDAFs. Actually, the deviation between BZ mechanism and NDAFs is more significant if X-ray flares are included 1 (e.g., Liu et al 2015b;Luo et al 2013;Mu et al 2016); Fourth, the millisecond magnetar model could cover almost all types of GRBs as said before. Cutler & Thorne (2002) reviewed the estimations for the event rates and the GW strengths of the well-known GW sources including NSs.…”
Section: Magnetarsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Moreover, for the same BH spin parameter and accretion rate, the BZ luminosity is larger by about two orders of magnitude than neutrino annihilation luminosity (e.g., Kawanaka et al 2013;Liu et al 2015;Lei et al 2017). Once considering that two mechanisms have the same conversion efficiency to power a certain GRB, the values of the BH spin parameter or the accretion rate for the BZ mechanism can be lower than those for the neutrino annihilation mechanism.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also assume a turn-off time of the BH central engine t f , beyond which the tail emission from jet fades as t −(2+β) , where β is the spectral index. The hyper-accreting BH system can launch a relativistic jet via neutrino-antineutrino annihilation (Popham et al 1999;Narayan et al 2001;Di Matteo et al 2002;Gu et al 2006;Chen & Beloborodov 2007;Janiuk et al 2004Janiuk et al , 2007Liu et al 2007Liu et al , 2015Lei et al 2009Lei et al , 2017Xie et al 2016), or Blandford-Znajek mechanism (hereafter BZ; (Blandford & Znajek 1977;Lee et al 2000;Li 2000;Lei et al 2005Lei et al , 2013). The neutrino annihilation mechanism suffers strong baryon loading from the disk and therefore may be too "dirty" to account for a GRB jet Xie et al 2017).…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%