2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadd0b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jet Radiation Properties of 4C +49.22: from the Core to Large-scale Knots

Abstract: 4C +49.22 is a γ-ray flat spectrum radio quasar with a bright and knotty jet. We investigate the properties of the core and large-scale knots by using their spectral energy distributions (SEDs). Analyzing its Fermi /LAT data in the past 8 years, a long-term steady γ-ray emission component is found besides bright outbursts. For the core region, the γ-ray emission together with the simultaneous emission in the low-energy bands at different epochs is explained with the single-zone leptonic model. The derived magn… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(148 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As given in Tables 3 and 4, P e jet  of the core is within 3 × 10 42 -10 44 erg s −1 while P e jet  of extended regions are in the range of ∼10 43 -10 44 erg s −1 . It is found that the jet powers of the core and extended regions for the three CSOs are roughly of the same order, and similar results have been reported for a γ-ray-emitting RG 3C 120 (Zargaryan et al 2017) and a blazar 4C +49.22 (Zhang et al 2018). We also estimate the kinetic power (P kin ) of the three CSOs with the radio luminosity at 1.4 GHz of extended regions using Equation (1) in Cavagnolo et al (2010) and obtain 1.4 × 10 44 erg s −1 , 3.0 × 10 42 erg s −1 and 7.3 × 10 43 erg s −1 for PKS 1718-649, NGC 3894 and TXS 0128+554, respectively.…”
Section: Broadband Sed Modeling and γ-Ray Originsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As given in Tables 3 and 4, P e jet  of the core is within 3 × 10 42 -10 44 erg s −1 while P e jet  of extended regions are in the range of ∼10 43 -10 44 erg s −1 . It is found that the jet powers of the core and extended regions for the three CSOs are roughly of the same order, and similar results have been reported for a γ-ray-emitting RG 3C 120 (Zargaryan et al 2017) and a blazar 4C +49.22 (Zhang et al 2018). We also estimate the kinetic power (P kin ) of the three CSOs with the radio luminosity at 1.4 GHz of extended regions using Equation (1) in Cavagnolo et al (2010) and obtain 1.4 × 10 44 erg s −1 , 3.0 × 10 42 erg s −1 and 7.3 × 10 43 erg s −1 for PKS 1718-649, NGC 3894 and TXS 0128+554, respectively.…”
Section: Broadband Sed Modeling and γ-Ray Originsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The time lag of optical V band to γ-ray can be explained by lepton synchrotron-self Compton (LSSC) model. However, there are two tentative radiation models to produce the γ-ray flux, i.e., lepton SSC model (Zhou et al 2014) and proton synchrotron model (Zhang et al 2012(Zhang et al , 2013(Zhang et al , 2018Gao et al 2018) for 3FGL J0449.4−4350. The strong correlations of the two different wavelength band of this source support the LSSC model.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consistency between the X-ray spectrum and the extrapolation of the radio-optical synchrotron emission indicates the same synchrotron radiation origin of X-ray emission (Sambruna et al 2007;Zhang et al 2010Zhang et al , 2018b. But for most substructures, the hard spectra in the X-ray band require a new radiation component different from the low energy band, and then the inverse Compton (IC) scattering process is suggested to explain the X-ray emission (e.g., Kataoka & Stawarz 2005;Zhang et al 2010Zhang et al , 2018b, i.e., the synchrotron-self-Compton (SSC, Stawarz et al 2007) model and the IC scattering of the cosmic microwave background (IC/CMB, Georganopoulos & Kazanas 2003;Abdo et al 2010;McKeough et al 2016;Wu et al 2017;Zhang et al 2018a;Guo et al 2018) model. The X-ray emission may be produced by the synchrotron radiation of the second electron population different from the radio-optical emission (e.g., Zhang et al 2009;Zargaryan et al 2017;Sun et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing with the variability of the core radiation, the emission of substructures in large-scale jets almost does not show any variation, which is also used to estimate the origin of the γ-ray emission (e.g.,Zhang et al 2018a;Guo et al 2018;Meyer et al 2019). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%