2011
DOI: 10.5802/aif.2675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jet schemes of complex plane branches and equisingularity

Abstract: For m ∈ N, we give formulas for the number N (m) of irreducible components of the m-th Jet Scheme of a complex branch C and for their codimensions, in terms of m and the generators of the semigroup of C. This structure of the Jet Schemes determines and is determined by the topological type of C.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we have that the global jet schemes of surfaces having such a singularity is irreducible [Mu], we prove that for m ∈ N, m big enough, the number N (m) of irreducble components of the schemes of m−jets centered at the singular point is independent of m. Note that this is not the case for instance for plane curves [Mo1]. This may not be the case also when we have rational singularities which are not locally complete intersection [Mo2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While we have that the global jet schemes of surfaces having such a singularity is irreducible [Mu], we prove that for m ∈ N, m big enough, the number N (m) of irreducble components of the schemes of m−jets centered at the singular point is independent of m. Note that this is not the case for instance for plane curves [Mo1]. This may not be the case also when we have rational singularities which are not locally complete intersection [Mo2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…But in general, there is no direct relation between the irreducbile components of jet schemes and those of the arc space. For instance, the function N (m), number of irreducible components of the schemes of m−jets centered in the singular point of a plane curve, goes to infinity when m goes to infinity [Mo1], while the space of arcs centered at the singular point is irreducible. Note that the Nash map is bijective for rational double point singularities [P1], [PS], [Pe], [Le], for surfaces with rational singularities [Re1], [Re2] and in general for surface singularities [deBPe].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…z n − x b 2 ). Therefore comparing graphs associated to γ and γ ′ with γ = γ ′ , we deduce from Theorem 3.3 in [26], that the graphs must be different. Now, suppose it is true for g − 1 characteristic exponents, and we will prove it for g. From Proposition 4.13 we deduce that is sufficient to prove that the graphs associated to the sets {γ 1 , .…”
Section: And In General Formentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(ii.b) If j ′ (m, ν) > g 1 , then we are in the case g 2 = g 1 + 1 and j ′ (m, ν) = g 1 + 1. There exists an integer 1 ≤ r < k g1+1 (ν) such that (26) l g1+1 (ν) + re g1+1 ≤ m < l g1+1 (ν) + (r + 1)e g1+1 .…”
Section: And In General Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subject of this note is the study of the jet schemes of toric surfaces. Beside being the simplest toric singularities, this class of singularities is interesting from two points of view: on one hand, these surfaces are examples of varieties having rational singularities, but which are not necessary local complete intersection, therefore we cannot characterize their rationality by [13] via their jet schemes; on the other hand, despite that these singularities are not complete intersections and therefore we do not have a definition of non-degeneration with respect to their Newton polyhedra in the sense of Kouchnirenko [9], they heuristically are non-degenerate because they are desingularized with one toric morphism, so from a jet-scheme theoretical point of view, their jet schemes should not give rise vanishing components [11] (i.e. projective systems of irreducible components whose limit in the arc space are included in the arc space of the singular locus); this follows from Remark 2.3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%