2016
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2015.2510582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

JLAB's Super High Momentum Spectrometer's Superconducting Q1 Magnet

Abstract: The commissioning and test results of a superferric superconducting quadrupole magnet constructed by Scientific Magnetics, Inc., for Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF also known as JLAB) will be presented. The quadrupole magnet, named Q1, is the first focusing element in the Super High Momentum Spectrometer (SHMS). The SHMS, which is located within JLAB's experimental Hall C, consists of all superconducting magnets in a dQQQD configuration and is part of the JLAB's 12-GeV upgrade. Here, "d"… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The training quenches were relatively mild and cryogenic recovery was quick, typically being less than one hour as the magnet's stored energy is approximately 0.21 MJ at 4000 A. The Q1 quadrupole did not undergo any training quenches to full field during commissioning [3]. No quenchback was observed during fast dump tests of the HB and Q1 [3], [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The training quenches were relatively mild and cryogenic recovery was quick, typically being less than one hour as the magnet's stored energy is approximately 0.21 MJ at 4000 A. The Q1 quadrupole did not undergo any training quenches to full field during commissioning [3]. No quenchback was observed during fast dump tests of the HB and Q1 [3], [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No quench-back perturbations or cryogenic effects were observed. Post-dump Q3 (1) 3,000 4.67 1.48 4.69 1.49 Q3 (1) 3,500 4.71 1.52 4.73 1.54 Q3 (2) 3,000 4.65 1.50 5.60 2.49 Q3 (2) 3,500 4.65 1.50 9.05 3.10 Dipole (3) 3,000 4.67 1.50 4.71 1.54 Dipole (3) 3,450 4.67 1.50 4.72 1.55 Dipole (2) 3,000 4.59 1.52 6.17 3.22 Dipole (2) 3,308 Rd = 0.0075 ; (2) Rd = 0.075  (design value); (3) Rd = 0.025  Table II compares the responses of the average coil temperature (from four temperature sensors, each placed on individual coil cold mass) and helium pressure with the reduced dump resistor and the original dump resistor. The average coil temperature would increase to a peak value after a fast dump, called the peak average coil temperature, before declining.…”
Section: A Test Results Of the Q3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efferson Lab's 11 GeV Super High Momentum Spectrometer (SHMS)-comprising of the following dipole and quadrupole magnets: Horizontal Bend (HB) dipole, Q1, Q2, Q3, and main Dipole-has been successfully commissioned and in operation since 2017. The Q1 was commissioned in April 2015; HB in January 2016; Q2 in December 2016; and Q3 and Dipole in February 2017 [1][2][3][4][5]. All five superconducting magnets met their maximum current operational levels at the 11 GeV specifications for Hall C [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(fforest@sigmaphi.fr) Horizontal Bend (HB) Dipole and the Q1 quadrupole. Both have been tested and accepted [4][5][6.This paper is concerned with the final assembly and factory testing of the SHMS Q2 and Q3 [2] identical quadrupoles and the SHMS Dipole [3]. The Q2, Q3 and Dipole are under construction with SigmaPhi located in Vannes, Brittany, France as the result of a pair of design build contracts issued late in 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%