2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1025352601751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In aqueous solution, they self‐assemble into large, rod‐like aggregates. By employing a similar synthetic strategy, alternating copolymer brushes consisting of PPO and PEO segments were also prepared, which self‐assemble into rod‐like or irregular aggregates in aqueous solution, depending on the overall polymer concentration 126…”
Section: Comb‐shaped Copolymer Brushesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In aqueous solution, they self‐assemble into large, rod‐like aggregates. By employing a similar synthetic strategy, alternating copolymer brushes consisting of PPO and PEO segments were also prepared, which self‐assemble into rod‐like or irregular aggregates in aqueous solution, depending on the overall polymer concentration 126…”
Section: Comb‐shaped Copolymer Brushesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ishizu's groups have also reported the synthesis and surfactant behavior of prototype amphiphilic copolymer brushes composed of PEO and poly(propylene oxide) (PPO). 17 Methacryloyl-terminated PPO macromonomer (PPO-MC; M n ¼ 1200) was synthesized by Figure 2. Plot of effective diffusion coefficient D eff against polymer concentration on PS/PEO prototype copolymer brushes P1 and P2 in benzene at 25 C. the reaction of commercially available poly(propylene glycol)monobutyl ether with methacryloyl chloride in THF in the addition of triethyl amine as an acid acceptor.…”
Section: Prototype Copolymer Brushesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, comb‐shaped polymer brushes can be categorized into homopolymer brushes and copolymer brushes. Since the pioneering work reported by Tsukahara et al3, 4 in 1989, extensive investigations have been devoted to the synthesis of homopolymer brushes mainly via three approaches including grafting‐through,5–20 grafting‐from,21–39 and grafting‐onto 40–46. In the past decade, the advent of controlled polymerization techniques, such as ring‐opening polymerization (ROP),5, 24, 25, 30, 37, 43 nitroxide‐mediated polymerization (NMP),47–49 atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP),16, 31–33, 35, 39 and reversible addition‐fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization,50, 51 have rendered the grafting‐from approach more appealing, starting with macroinitiators with the initiating sites distributed on every repeating unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, copolymer brushes typically consist of more than one type of polymer side chains. When two types of polymer grafts are involved, they can be arranged in a random,43, 46, 47 alternating,5, 12–14, 18, 19, 25, 34 block,22, 26, 51, 52 or “centipede” manner 33, 37, 53. Compared to homopolymer brushes, the incorporation of another type of polymer graft endows copolymer brushes with extra structural versatility and unique aggregation properties, resulting from the intrinsic immiscibility between two types of polymer grafts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%