Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The results are presented of a study concerned with the prediction of the air ow noise transmitted through an element of the fuselage structure: a double panel of nite extent that consists of a pair of thin elastic plates containing a light insulating material separated from the inner skin by an air gap. This con guration is representative of typical compound sidewalls in large commercial aircraft. A solution based on modal coupling is obtained and validated by comparisons with other solutions on various test cases. A physical interpretation is given for the calculated vibroacoustic response of a double partition system excited by a turbulent boundary layer, and the effect of an air gap between the insulation facing bag and the trim panel is analyzed. It is shown that the levels of the inwardly radiated sound power are mainly determined by the contribution of the rst skin panel-controlled mode, and the added damping effect due to the insulating material has little effect below this resonance. To achieve sound reduction in the very low-frequency domain, the performance of various active control strategies are examined and compared. It is found that the most ef cient strategy is the suppression of the low-order skin panel structural modes. However, we note that signi cant reductions in the sound power radiated can also be achieved by the active suppression of the low-order structural modes of the trim panel. Nomenclature A s , A t = skin and trim panel surfaces a = vector of cavity modes amplitudes C = damping modal matrix C e = cospectrum of the wall-pressure eld c a = sound speed of the equivalent uid into the cavity c e = external sound speed c i = sound speed of the internal uid c j = equivalent uid coef cients, j D 1; : : : ; 8 D s = skin panel exural rigidity d = cavity depth F = vector of the cavity modes F n = rigid wall cavity modes f c = hydrodynamic coincidence frequency k = wave number vector L s;nm , L t;nm = modal coupling coef cient between the nth cavity mode and the mth skin or trim panel mode l x , l y = respectively, spanwise and streamwise dimensions of the panels M = mass modal matrix M i;m , M a;n = generalized masses associated to the mth panels mode and to the nth cavity mode N a = number of cavity modes accounted for in the simulations N s , N t = number of skin and trim panels modes accounted for in the simulations P i = amplitude of the incident pressure eld p a = cavity pressure eld p t = sound pressure radiated by the trim panel on its surface p t = vector of complex acoustic pressure at the trim panel surface Q = eigenvector matrix of <[Z] Q e = vector of generalized forces Q e s;m = generalized external force associated to the mth skin panel mode q fs;tg = vector of complex structural modes amplitudes <[Z]= modal radiation resistance matrix of the trim panel r x , r y = separation distances, respectively, in the spanwise and in the streamwise directions S = stiffness modal matrix t = time U c = convection velocity U 1 = freestream velocity V = cavity volume W i = incident sound power ...
The results are presented of a study concerned with the prediction of the air ow noise transmitted through an element of the fuselage structure: a double panel of nite extent that consists of a pair of thin elastic plates containing a light insulating material separated from the inner skin by an air gap. This con guration is representative of typical compound sidewalls in large commercial aircraft. A solution based on modal coupling is obtained and validated by comparisons with other solutions on various test cases. A physical interpretation is given for the calculated vibroacoustic response of a double partition system excited by a turbulent boundary layer, and the effect of an air gap between the insulation facing bag and the trim panel is analyzed. It is shown that the levels of the inwardly radiated sound power are mainly determined by the contribution of the rst skin panel-controlled mode, and the added damping effect due to the insulating material has little effect below this resonance. To achieve sound reduction in the very low-frequency domain, the performance of various active control strategies are examined and compared. It is found that the most ef cient strategy is the suppression of the low-order skin panel structural modes. However, we note that signi cant reductions in the sound power radiated can also be achieved by the active suppression of the low-order structural modes of the trim panel. Nomenclature A s , A t = skin and trim panel surfaces a = vector of cavity modes amplitudes C = damping modal matrix C e = cospectrum of the wall-pressure eld c a = sound speed of the equivalent uid into the cavity c e = external sound speed c i = sound speed of the internal uid c j = equivalent uid coef cients, j D 1; : : : ; 8 D s = skin panel exural rigidity d = cavity depth F = vector of the cavity modes F n = rigid wall cavity modes f c = hydrodynamic coincidence frequency k = wave number vector L s;nm , L t;nm = modal coupling coef cient between the nth cavity mode and the mth skin or trim panel mode l x , l y = respectively, spanwise and streamwise dimensions of the panels M = mass modal matrix M i;m , M a;n = generalized masses associated to the mth panels mode and to the nth cavity mode N a = number of cavity modes accounted for in the simulations N s , N t = number of skin and trim panels modes accounted for in the simulations P i = amplitude of the incident pressure eld p a = cavity pressure eld p t = sound pressure radiated by the trim panel on its surface p t = vector of complex acoustic pressure at the trim panel surface Q = eigenvector matrix of <[Z] Q e = vector of generalized forces Q e s;m = generalized external force associated to the mth skin panel mode q fs;tg = vector of complex structural modes amplitudes <[Z]= modal radiation resistance matrix of the trim panel r x , r y = separation distances, respectively, in the spanwise and in the streamwise directions S = stiffness modal matrix t = time U c = convection velocity U 1 = freestream velocity V = cavity volume W i = incident sound power ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.