Untitled

Varfolomeev, B. G.; Pebalk, V. L.; Chigogidze, K. Sh.; Lan, Nguen Ngok; Fernando, R. S.

doi:10.1023/a:1005220923651

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To prove the accuracy of derived correlations (Eqns and ) and results, the authors compared Eqn with the Varfolomeev's correlation (Eqns and ) . Additionally, Eqn was compared with the Ghaffari's experimental data .…”

Section: Correlation Of the Mean Drop Sizementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Additionally, Eqn was compared with the Ghaffari's experimental data . In detail, the deviation of Eqn from the Varfolomeev's correlation was equal to 28.5% . Furthermore, Eqn had a variance of about 16.8% from the Ghaffari's experimental data .…”

Section: Correlation Of the Mean Drop Sizementioning

confidence: 99%

“…One of the most important parameters in liquid–liquid extraction columns is the dispersed phase droplet behavior, because of its effect on mass transfer coefficient . A large amount of work exists in the literature concerning the prediction of drop size distribution in liquid–liquid dispersions in extraction columns, and most of them are only applicable for particular conditions of those processes …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Varfolomeev et al . have derived a correlation for the prediction of Sauter mean diameter, D 32 , for the spray extraction columns:

\begin{matrix} center \\ center E o_{bold-italicD} = 2.86 R e_{bold-italicN}^{- 0.125} S^{- 0.043} & center R e_{normalN} = 4.6 - 190 \end{matrix}

\begin{matrix} center \\ center E o_{bold-italicD} = 0.86 R e_{bold-italicN}^{- 0.125} S^{- 0.043} {((), 1 - ϕ)}^{- 1.5} {((), \frac{μ_{d}}{μ_{c}})}^{- 0.65} & center R e_{normalN} = 430 - 1200 \end{matrix}

where Eo D is the Eotvos number, Re N is the nozzle Reynolds number, S is a dimensionless expression, Φ is the holdup, and μ d and μ c are the viscosities of the dispersed phase and the continuous phase, respectively.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Spray and packed liquid–liquid extraction columns: drop size and dispersed phase mass transfer

Khorshidi

Abolghasemi

Khakpay

et al. 2013

Asia-Pacific J Chem Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effects of holdup on Sauter mean drop diameter, D 32 , and dispersed phase mass transfer coefficient have been studied in the spray and packed extraction columns. For both columns, two well-defined regions for the dependence of D 32 on holdup were observed. D 32 increased and decreased with an increase in holdup at low and high levels of holdup, respectively. Changes in dispersed phase mass transfer coefficient against holdup were shown to be similar to D 32 for both columns. Moreover, empirical correlations have been derived to predict D 32 and dispersed phase mass transfer coefficient for both columns. It has been shown that the derived correlations are in a good agreement with the experimental data.

show abstract

Section: Correlation Of the Mean Drop Sizementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Correlation Of the Mean Drop Sizementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Varfolomeev et al . have derived a correlation for the prediction of Sauter mean diameter, D 32 , for the spray extraction columns: