2001
DOI: 10.1207/s15324818ame1404_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Job Analysis and the Specification of Content for Licensure and Certification Examinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kane 1997;Raymond 2001). The number of items assigned to each category is then based on the relative importance of those categories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kane 1997;Raymond 2001). The number of items assigned to each category is then based on the relative importance of those categories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies present various job analysis methods. Raymond (2001) argued that critical case methods, functional job analysis, position analysis survey, and capability requirement scales are used universally [7]. Furthermore, several analysis methods are identified, such as the initial analysis method, the confirmation comparison method, and the group debate method [8].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, a job or practice analysis is undertaken to investigate the specific skills that are needed to perform adequately in the field. 25 Validity evidence based on response processes can take many forms. On an oral examination, for example, evidence needs to be gathered to show that the raters are using the evaluation criteria appropriately and are not being influenced by factors (e.g., sex, race, or training location) that are irrelevant to the intended interpretation of the scores.…”
Section: Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%