2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Job design with conflicting tasks reconsidered

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
36
2
Order By: Relevance
“…effort independent) part of the second‐stage success probability. Our results differ from the case studied by Schmitz (), who considers outcome externalities with regard to the marginal second‐stage success probability.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…effort independent) part of the second‐stage success probability. Our results differ from the case studied by Schmitz (), who considers outcome externalities with regard to the marginal second‐stage success probability.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Dewatripont and Tirole () originally analyse conflicting tasks in an incomplete contracting model, but such an issue can also be explored in a complete contracting approach (see Bolton & Dewatripont, , ch. 6; Schmitz, , p. 109). Bolton and Dewatripont () pioneeringly identify effort externalities between simultaneous tasks in terms of the success probability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If an agent exerts effort in two subsequent periods, second-period rents can be utilized by the principal to optimally design first-period incentives. This effect was first emphasized by Schmitz (2005a) and further elaborated by Schmitz (2005bSchmitz ( , 2012, Ohlendorf and Schmitz (2012), and Kräkel and Schöttner (2010). In our setting, contrary to these contributions, the principal may actually find it optimal to dampen first-period incentives that stem from prospective second-period rents.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 67%
“…Let wH (wL) denote the wage paid to the worker if realized output is π (zero). To exclude the discussion of additional cases that do not really add to the analysis, I assume that π is sufficiently large so that the firm always wants to implement high effort e=1 (see similarly Schmitz, , p. 322; Schmitz, , p. 110; Kaya and Vereshchagina, , p. 297): π>p1p1p0·maxcδτlp1p0,cδτl+u¯2p1.This condition implies that second‐period employment of the worker is efficient, given that he works hard: p1πcδτl>trueu¯2π>cδτl+trueu¯2p1.…”
Section: The Basic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%