1998
DOI: 10.1080/000368498325110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Job exit of men: new job destination versus unemployment destination

Abstract: Job exit of men over the age of forty is described and analysed using monthly observations derived from the 1988-89 UK Retirement Survey. A competing risks model is described and estimated. The results show that tenure and age determine transitions from a job to a new one, whereas those transitions from a job to unemployment are also determined by business cycle variables.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We treat the transitions to other labour market states as right censored at the point of exit as it is done in the literature. This is referred to as independence between risks or transition probabilities (see, for example, Addison and Portugal, 2003; Carling et al ., 1996; Gonzalo, 1998; Narendranathan and Stewart, 1993). In the estimations, the three alternative specifications by the hazard rate for the grouped duration approach following Sueyoshi (1995) are considered.…”
Section: The Econometric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We treat the transitions to other labour market states as right censored at the point of exit as it is done in the literature. This is referred to as independence between risks or transition probabilities (see, for example, Addison and Portugal, 2003; Carling et al ., 1996; Gonzalo, 1998; Narendranathan and Stewart, 1993). In the estimations, the three alternative specifications by the hazard rate for the grouped duration approach following Sueyoshi (1995) are considered.…”
Section: The Econometric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…xiv We treat the transitions to other labour market states as right censored at the point of exit as it is done in the literature. This is referred to as independence between risks or transition probabilities (see for example, Narendranathan and Stewart, 1993;Carling et al, 1996, Gonzalo, 1998and Addison and Portugal, 2003. In the estimations, the three alternative specifications by the hazard rate for the grouped duration approach following Sueyoshi (1995) are considered.…”
Section: The Econometric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%