2017
DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-8092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Job Fairs: Matching Firms and Workers in a Field Experiment in Ethiopia

Abstract: The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. The papers carry the names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the International Ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 In line with these results, we do not find aggregate employment effects through improved market access. In a companion field experiment, we run a job fair with an additional sample drawn from the same population (Abebe et al, 2017); consistent with the results in this paper, and with results in Groh et al (2015) and Beam (2016), that job fair generates very few successful matches, and has no detectable effect on total employment. 8 The current paper helps to explain why such matching interventions are unlikely to have large employment effects.…”
Section: An Experiments In Labour Market Inclusionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…7 In line with these results, we do not find aggregate employment effects through improved market access. In a companion field experiment, we run a job fair with an additional sample drawn from the same population (Abebe et al, 2017); consistent with the results in this paper, and with results in Groh et al (2015) and Beam (2016), that job fair generates very few successful matches, and has no detectable effect on total employment. 8 The current paper helps to explain why such matching interventions are unlikely to have large employment effects.…”
Section: An Experiments In Labour Market Inclusionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…10 Most of the vocational training literature on similar programs in high-or middle-income countries finds low or insignificant effects (Card et al, 2010;Kluve, 2010;Dar and Tzannatos, 1999). 11 Other authors document similarly sized impacts based on related active labor market policies such as wage subsidies (Galasso et al, 2004;Groh et al, 2016;Levinsohn et al, 2014)) or search and matching assistance (Abebe et al, 2016a(Abebe et al, , 2016bFranklin, 2015;Jensen, 2012;Groh et al, 2015;Dammert et al, 2015;Beam, 2016;Abel et al, 2016;Bassi and Nansamba, 2017) or education-related interventions documented by Nikolov and Jimi (2018).…”
Section: The Labor Market In Nepalmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…But they are larger than offline job search networks in similar settings. Young workseekers in Addis Ababa and Johannesburg regularly discuss their job search with a median of 2-6 people (Abebe et al, 2017;Caria et al, 2018;Carranza et al, 2019). However, we do not observe if workseekers in our sample regularly interact with their LinkedIn connections on or off the platform.…”
Section: Treatment Effects On Linkedin Usementioning
confidence: 55%
“…But any matching that takes place is decentralized, not managed centrally as part of the treatment. The literature on centralized matching has yielded mixed results, with few studies finding large positive effects on employment (Groh et al, 2015;Beam, 2016;Abebe et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%