PsycEXTRA Dataset 1992
DOI: 10.1037/e640052009-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Job Performance Measurement System Development Process

Abstract: 92-32638AIR FORCE MATERIEL COMMAND BROOKS AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS 78235-5000 NOTICES This technical report is published as received and has not been edited by the technical editing staff of the Armstrong Laboratory.When Government drawings, specifications, or other data are used for any purpose other than in connection with a definitely Government-related procurement, the United States Government incurs no responsibility or any obligation whatsoever. The fact that the Government may have formulated or in any way… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reflects the fact that WTPTs were designed to include a greater proportion of difficult, as compared with easier, tasks (see Laue et al, 1992). Task Experience means indicated that participants were moderately familiar with the tasks they performed in the WTPTs.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This reflects the fact that WTPTs were designed to include a greater proportion of difficult, as compared with easier, tasks (see Laue et al, 1992). Task Experience means indicated that participants were moderately familiar with the tasks they performed in the WTPTs.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The major purposes of this project were to link 3-7 enlistment standards to on-the-job performance and to explore alternative technologies for measuring job performance. The conceptualization, design, and execution of the JPM Project has been discussed extensively elsewhere (Hedge & Teachout, 1986Kavanagh et al, 1987;Lance, Teachout, & Donnelly, 1992;Laue, Hedge, Wall, Pederson, & Bentley, 1992;Ree, Earles, & Teachout, 1994;Teachout & Pellum, 1991). Thus only the particular aspects of the JPM Project that are relevant to the present study are highlighted here.…”
Section: Methods Study Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, candidate tasks were reviewed by SMEs in "task 3-8 Work Samples 9 validation workshops" (see Laue et al, 1992) to insure that constituent task steps were observable and that they could be scored unambiguously as being completed correctly or incorrectly. The purposes of this selection criterion were to insure that (a) discrete task steps were directly identifiable and observable by work sample administrators, and (b) performance on each task step could be scored as correct or incorrect according to specified criteria, thus minimizing potential ambiguities in scoring work sample test items that Borman and Hallam (1991) had identified earlier.…”
Section: Work Sample Task Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%