2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2000.tb00008.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Job queues, discrimination, and affirmative action

Abstract: If employers ha¨e different Becker-type discrimination coefficients for different demographic groups, then the implementation of affirmati¨e action may ha¨e a differential impact on those groups. We estimate two¨ector autoregressi¨e models of the U.S. economy, including the unemployment rates of four demographic groups. We find that a job queue existed before the implementation of affirmati¨e action and that affirmati¨e action changed the ordering of the job queue in manner that had a negati¨e impact on nonwhi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the unemployment rate responses to an output shock could, in fact, change over time. Bisping and Fain (2000) find evidence that the relative unemployment rate responses of various demographic groups are different in the period before affirmative action laws were enacted than in the period after they were enacted. Since affirmative action laws were first enacted in May 1968, the entire period covered in our study was subject to affirmative action laws.…”
Section: Empirical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that the unemployment rate responses to an output shock could, in fact, change over time. Bisping and Fain (2000) find evidence that the relative unemployment rate responses of various demographic groups are different in the period before affirmative action laws were enacted than in the period after they were enacted. Since affirmative action laws were first enacted in May 1968, the entire period covered in our study was subject to affirmative action laws.…”
Section: Empirical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…They find that the spatial job search quality is lower for blacks than for whites and that blacks tend to search for jobs in areas with lower employment growth than whites. Bisping and Fain (2000) examine the affect of affirmative action on the unemployment rates of white males, white females, nonwhite males, and nonwhite females. Using a vector autoregressive model (VAR) and estimating responses with a cumulative impulse response function (CIRF), they estimate the effect that an unemployment rate shock to one demographic group has on the unemployment rates of the other three demographic groups.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…white females). For evidence on this last issue, see Bisping and Fain (2000). 5 For the U.S., see e.g.…”
Section: Contents Lists Available At Sciencedirectmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, Bisping and Fain (2000) argue that the implementation of affirmative action policies in the United States labour market in the aftermath of the 1964 Civil Rights Act changed the ordering of job queues. Before affirmative action, White men came first followed by White women, non-White men and non-White women.…”
Section: Institutional Discrimination and Racismmentioning
confidence: 99%