Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Purpose to identify the questionnaires and scales used as subjective tools for the assessment process regarding the benefit and satisfaction of users of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids to answer the following guiding question: Which questionnaires and scales are used in adults to evaluate the benefit and satisfaction of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid users? Research strategy the search was carried out in the PubMed, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science, Lilacs and Embase databases and, in gray literature, Google Academic and Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations were used as information sources. The descriptors used were: bone-anchored prosthesis, hearing loss, mixed conductive-sensorineural, quality of life, patient satisfaction, surveys and questionnaires. Selection criteria studies that used questionnaires and scales to verify the benefit and satisfaction of users of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid, published in Portuguese, English or Spanish, from 1999 to 2022, were included. Results 176 articles were identified. Of this total, 67 were included in the scoping review. The literature indicated that the most used tools in the process of assessing benefit and satisfaction in Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid users were the Glasgow Benefit Inventory questionnaires, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit , and the Speech, Spatial, and Quality of Hearing Scale. Conclusion There are several instruments to be used, such as the Glasgow Benefit Inventory and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit for benefits and the exclusive Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire for the specific satisfaction of this population. As far as scales are concerned, The Speech, Spatial and Hearing Qualities Scale evaluates the benefit.
Purpose to identify the questionnaires and scales used as subjective tools for the assessment process regarding the benefit and satisfaction of users of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids to answer the following guiding question: Which questionnaires and scales are used in adults to evaluate the benefit and satisfaction of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid users? Research strategy the search was carried out in the PubMed, SciELO, Scopus, Web of Science, Lilacs and Embase databases and, in gray literature, Google Academic and Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations were used as information sources. The descriptors used were: bone-anchored prosthesis, hearing loss, mixed conductive-sensorineural, quality of life, patient satisfaction, surveys and questionnaires. Selection criteria studies that used questionnaires and scales to verify the benefit and satisfaction of users of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid, published in Portuguese, English or Spanish, from 1999 to 2022, were included. Results 176 articles were identified. Of this total, 67 were included in the scoping review. The literature indicated that the most used tools in the process of assessing benefit and satisfaction in Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid users were the Glasgow Benefit Inventory questionnaires, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit , and the Speech, Spatial, and Quality of Hearing Scale. Conclusion There are several instruments to be used, such as the Glasgow Benefit Inventory and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit for benefits and the exclusive Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire for the specific satisfaction of this population. As far as scales are concerned, The Speech, Spatial and Hearing Qualities Scale evaluates the benefit.
RESUMO Objetivo identificar os questionários e escalas utilizados na avaliação do benefício e da satisfação dos usuários de próteses auditivas ancoradas no osso, respondendo a questão norteadora: “Quais questionários e escalas são utilizados para avaliar o benefício e a satisfação dos usuários de prótese auditiva ancorada no osso?”. Estratégia de pesquisa busca realizada nas bases de dados Public Medicine Library, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS e Embase. Na literatura cinzenta, utilizou-se a fonte de informação Google Acadêmico e a Biblioteca Digital Brasileira de Teses e dissertações, por meio dos descritores: prótese ancorada no osso (bone-anchored prosthesis), perda auditiva condutiva-neurossensorial mista (hearing loss, mixed conductive-sensorineural), qualidade de vida (quality of life), satisfação do paciente (patient satisfaction), inquéritos e questionários (surveys and questionnaires). Critérios de seleção incluídos estudos que utilizaram questionários e escalas para verificar o benefício e a satisfação dos usuários de prótese auditiva ancorada no osso, publicados em português, inglês ou espanhol, de 1999 até 2024. Resultados foram identificados 176 artigos e, destes, 67 foram incluídos na revisão de escopo. A literatura apontou que as ferramentas mais utilizadas foram os questionários Glasgow Benefit Inventory, o Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit e a escala Speech, Spatial, and Quality of Hearing Scale. Conclusão vários são os instrumentos utilizados na avaliação do benefício e da satisfação dos usuários de próteses auditivas ancoradas no osso, como o Glasgow Benefit Inventory e o Abbreviate Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit para benefício e o Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire, exclusivo para satisfação específica dessa população. Quanto à escala tem-se a Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale para avaliar benefício.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.