“…to include other factors of heterogeneity, in addition to gender, that may affect the decision of women and men to participate in the labor market after receiving the CSG. As shown by a large body of literature (Burger and von Fintel, 2014;Fourie and Leibbrandt, 2012;Kingdon and Knight, 2006;Posel et al, 2006;Posel et al, 2014, Yu, 2013a, 2013b, among many others), education influences the benefits and costs of participating in the labor market, and thus, we may expect different behavioral responses to the CSG for more-educated and less-educated women or men. In more detail, education (matriculation, in particular) encourages labor force participation and job search and increases employment prospects (Fourie and Leibbrandt, 2012) 18 A similar argument applies when considering the urban/rural dichotomy and families receiving only the CSG vs. those receiving both the CSG and the OAP (see Section 2) 19 .…”