2000
DOI: 10.1007/s001700070029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Job Shop Scheduling with Dynamic Fuzzy Selection of Dispatching Rules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A fuzzy scheduler yields superior average flowtime, average tardiness, and average lateness performance over other simple routing heuristics such as WINQ and SPT. Other references of interest include (Murata et al, 1998;Sakawa and Kubota, 2000;Subramaniam et al, 2000;Bilkay et al, 2004).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fuzzy scheduler yields superior average flowtime, average tardiness, and average lateness performance over other simple routing heuristics such as WINQ and SPT. Other references of interest include (Murata et al, 1998;Sakawa and Kubota, 2000;Subramaniam et al, 2000;Bilkay et al, 2004).…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the suggested two-tier control scheme was evaluated using a test environment that is similar in size and scope to environments used in other previous studies on dynamic scheduling such as Talavage (1991, 1994), Chandra and Talavage (1991), Kazerooni et al (1997), Arzi and Iaroslavitz (1999), Subramaniam et al (2000), and Chryssolouris and Subramaniam (2001). The experimental environment in this study consists of six work-centers that can fail from time to time and must be repaired.…”
Section: The Test Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesghouni et al (1999), Qi et al (2000), Rossi and Dini (2000), and Chryssolouris and Subramaniam (2001) solved the dynamic scheduling problem in FMS using genetic algorithms. Yu et al (1999) and Subramaniam et al (2000) employed fuzzy logic and Trentesaux et al (2000) used intelligent agents to select the appropriate scheduling rule. Other studies used hybrid schemes such as neural networks and inductive learning , fuzzy logic and a genetic algorithm (Fanti et al, 1998), fuzzy logic and simulation (Kazerooni et al, 1997), and finally a combination of learning, intelligent agents, and simulation (Aydin and Oztemel, 2000).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the problems are small, it is possible to generate optimal schedules using a branch or a bound approach (Brucker et al, 1993). For larger problems, special solution strategies based on priority rules have to be used to ensure execution times of a few minutes (Peres, 1995;Adams et al, 1988;Subramaniam et al, 2000).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%