2013
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139013727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

John Cage and David Tudor

Abstract: John Cage is best known for his indeterminate music, which leaves a significant level of creative decision-making in the hands of the performer. But how much licence did Cage allow? Martin Iddon's book is the first volume to collect the complete extant correspondence between the composer and pianist David Tudor, one of Cage's most provocative and significant musical collaborators. The book presents their partnership from working together in New York in the early 1950s, through periods on tour… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses of performances resulting from such collaborations thus call for a reappraisal of the relationship between the composer and performer, as exemplified by Clarke et al (2005). Certain authors (see, for example, Iddon, 2013;and Karantonis et al, 2014) have explored these processes and relationships via documentary research, though without reference to the artefactual evidence of recordings. Within the performance-analytical literature, the tantalising archival work of Nedelman hints at the epistemological possibilities afforded by cross-examination of performer testimony, working notes, sketch materials, and recordings of New Music.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses of performances resulting from such collaborations thus call for a reappraisal of the relationship between the composer and performer, as exemplified by Clarke et al (2005). Certain authors (see, for example, Iddon, 2013;and Karantonis et al, 2014) have explored these processes and relationships via documentary research, though without reference to the artefactual evidence of recordings. Within the performance-analytical literature, the tantalising archival work of Nedelman hints at the epistemological possibilities afforded by cross-examination of performer testimony, working notes, sketch materials, and recordings of New Music.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I bracket the longstanding controversy in this tradition over the referentiality of recorded sound. Indicative of the incipient critical literature on these lineages are Nicholls (1991); Toop (1995Toop ( , 2016; Potter (2002); Collins (2004); Beal (2006Beal ( , 2009; Labelle (2006); Licht (2007Licht ( , 2009; Joseph (2008); Adlington (2009); Demers (2010); Grimshaw (2011); Piekut (2011Piekut ( , 2014; Piekut and Nicolls (2012); Iddon (2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 20th century, avant-garde musical form was composed and appreciated differently, through the participation of the composer, performers and listeners alike. As Cage permits performers to complete their freedom of choices (Iddon, 2013), the musical work is tightly interwoven with their participation, thus never the same. How should one analyse music with regard to the new formation?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%