2009
DOI: 10.1080/07350190902958677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

John Pym, Ideographs, and the Rhetoric of Opposition to the English Crown

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Abbot and Turnbull clearly do not state their rejection of feminist tenets, while self‐identifying as feminist, but there is little evidence either implicitly or explicitly of their underlying philosophical commitment to the cause of feminism. While Kuypers and Althouse () discuss ideographic shifts over time, this research identifies a shift not just over time but a shift by gender. The different meanings for men and women undermine the power of the term feminist as an ideograph to represent a collective comment, and instead leads to gendered approaches to the term.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Abbot and Turnbull clearly do not state their rejection of feminist tenets, while self‐identifying as feminist, but there is little evidence either implicitly or explicitly of their underlying philosophical commitment to the cause of feminism. While Kuypers and Althouse () discuss ideographic shifts over time, this research identifies a shift not just over time but a shift by gender. The different meanings for men and women undermine the power of the term feminist as an ideograph to represent a collective comment, and instead leads to gendered approaches to the term.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This research extends the extant ideographical scholarship in three ways. First, we extend the primarily US‐based ideographic research (such as Atkinson, ; Kuypers & Althouse, ) by focusing on an Australian sociocultural–political context, and extending current understanding of the culturally nuanced evocation of ideographic terminology. Second, we add to the existing appreciation of ideographic analysis as a means of investigating the rhetorical deployment of ideologically based terminology by, of and about women.…”
Section: Ideographic Criticismmentioning
confidence: 95%