2021
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.103.062801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Johnson-Nyquist noise effects in neutron electric-dipole-moment experiments

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the difference between adiabatic and nonadiabatic magnetic-field samplings for UCNs and 199 Hg atoms, the volume-averaged fields sampled by both species are slightly different. A finite-element analysis was used to simulate temporal and spatial noise [74] from which we calculated the time-and-volume-averaged magnetic-field difference sensed by both particle ensembles. As JNN leads to random magnetic-field fluctuations independent of ⃗ B 0 polarity, we assume that this effect δ JNN only increases the measurement uncertainty but does not shift the central R value.…”
Section: Crossing-point Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the difference between adiabatic and nonadiabatic magnetic-field samplings for UCNs and 199 Hg atoms, the volume-averaged fields sampled by both species are slightly different. A finite-element analysis was used to simulate temporal and spatial noise [74] from which we calculated the time-and-volume-averaged magnetic-field difference sensed by both particle ensembles. As JNN leads to random magnetic-field fluctuations independent of ⃗ B 0 polarity, we assume that this effect δ JNN only increases the measurement uncertainty but does not shift the central R value.…”
Section: Crossing-point Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%