2003
DOI: 10.1111/1478-9299.00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joined-up Government: A Survey

Abstract: This paper first identifies the varied meanings and objectives of joined-up government (JUG). Subsequently it explores the costs and risks involved, and briefly reviews some of the relevant academic literature. Having thus clarified the key concepts and situated the current fashion for a 'holistic approach' within the broader literature on co-ordination, the paper also considers a range of approaches to the assessment of progress with JUG.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
318
1
34

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 492 publications
(356 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
318
1
34
Order By: Relevance
“…Opensourcing is particularly useful for problems that require cumulative knowledge or that needs collaboration and integration of different perspective and resources. The goal of opensourcing is to provide services that solve common problems or create public goods (Pollitt, 2003). The adoption of opensourcing requires the acquisition of specific expertise able to effectively manage the external contributions without any possibility to plan, control and predefine the final outcome.…”
Section: Opensourced Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opensourcing is particularly useful for problems that require cumulative knowledge or that needs collaboration and integration of different perspective and resources. The goal of opensourcing is to provide services that solve common problems or create public goods (Pollitt, 2003). The adoption of opensourcing requires the acquisition of specific expertise able to effectively manage the external contributions without any possibility to plan, control and predefine the final outcome.…”
Section: Opensourced Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the inevitable 'messy compromises' entailed in real world organizational practice does not detract from the force of the argument that, at its discursive core, leaderism projects and protects the values and interests of an idealized 'service user/consumer' that it has inherited from the neo-liberal ideological elements accompanying new managerialism/NPM. This contextual change from a concern with simple performance, targets or consumer wishes is further indicated in the evolution of policy evaluation from a managerial concern with inputs and outputs to broader concerns with the co-ordination of multiple services (Davies 2009;Pollitt 2003) and the social outcomes of policy (Strategy Unit 2006).…”
Section: Leaderism Leaderism (O'reilly and Reed 2010mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, those same politicians soon found out that changing the structure and organization of their central governments was a hard nut to crack. Not only did administrative reforms evoke harsh political opposition, they also increased-if successful at all-fragmentation and coordination costs (Pollitt 2003;Christensen and Laegreid 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%