2016
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.856.224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joining Technologies for Material Substitution by Using Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastics

Abstract: In modern society, sustainability, resources awareness and energy saving are becoming increasingly important. At the same time, advanced high-tech products are requested by the customers. A promising approach to address these demands is the use of lightweight constructions with a focus on the utilization of mixed materials. Therefore, competitive, economic and producible joining technologies for carbon fiber reinforced plastics are required. This paper firstly discusses the benefits of materials substitution b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple studies on material substitution have been done and published, but they often have one of two viewpoints; looking at a specific industry or type of product where Poulikidou, et al (2015) can be used as an example, or looking at how a specific material can be introduced, where Jonsson (2006) and Boehner, et al (2017) can be highlighted as examples. Sometimes, both these perspectives are applied simultaneously, especially in case studies (Smith & Kienhöfer, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies on material substitution have been done and published, but they often have one of two viewpoints; looking at a specific industry or type of product where Poulikidou, et al (2015) can be used as an example, or looking at how a specific material can be introduced, where Jonsson (2006) and Boehner, et al (2017) can be highlighted as examples. Sometimes, both these perspectives are applied simultaneously, especially in case studies (Smith & Kienhöfer, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%