2017
DOI: 10.1177/0092055x17714030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joining the Global Village: Teaching Globalization with Wikipedia

Abstract: This paper presents an analysis of my experiences with a teaching activity that engages students in publishing in Wikipedia on issues relating to globalization. It begins with a short overview of some of the current debates revolving around teaching globalization, which lay ground for the assignment. I discuss how this teaching tool fits with a number of dimensions related to teaching globalization, particularly with an international service learning approach. Finally, I present assessment data from a series o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Being by most measures the most widely read knowledge repository on Earth, Wikipedia is often treated as unworthy of academic attention (Jemielniak, D. 2019), although some opposite experiences have been already presented (e.g. Selwyn, N. and Gorard, S. 2016;Konieczny, P. 2017;Di Lauro, F. and Johinke, R. 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being by most measures the most widely read knowledge repository on Earth, Wikipedia is often treated as unworthy of academic attention (Jemielniak, D. 2019), although some opposite experiences have been already presented (e.g. Selwyn, N. and Gorard, S. 2016;Konieczny, P. 2017;Di Lauro, F. and Johinke, R. 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially in HE, there is a common assumption that Wikipedia is a low-quality source and students are discouraged from using it. On the contrary, the reception of Wikipedia in academia is changing quickly and sometimes is even used for teaching [16]. There are also a number of references showing that Wikipedia’s quality is actually on par with professional sources, for example, in some medical issues [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%