2012
DOI: 10.1016/s1138-4891(12)70047-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joining the un global compact in spain : an institutional Aproach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While institutional isomorphism is developing in accordance with three mechanisms, namely coercive, mimetic, and normative. Based on the concept of institutional isomorphism, institutional influences are dispersed through an organizational area called the organization's field, which means that organizations as a whole are a recognized area of institutional life, namely key suppliers, resources and product customers, regulatory dependencies, and other organizations that provide similar services and products (Erro and Sanchez, 2012). Structural isomorphism is described as an important consequence of the competitive and institutional processes.…”
Section: Institutional Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While institutional isomorphism is developing in accordance with three mechanisms, namely coercive, mimetic, and normative. Based on the concept of institutional isomorphism, institutional influences are dispersed through an organizational area called the organization's field, which means that organizations as a whole are a recognized area of institutional life, namely key suppliers, resources and product customers, regulatory dependencies, and other organizations that provide similar services and products (Erro and Sanchez, 2012). Structural isomorphism is described as an important consequence of the competitive and institutional processes.…”
Section: Institutional Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural isomorphism is described as an important consequence of the competitive and institutional processes. As a result, organizations do not compete to gain resources or customers but to gain power and legitimacy, in addition to social welfare and economic outcomes (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983;Erro and Sanchez, 2012;Akbar et al, 2012;Ahyaruddin and Akbar, 2016). Meyer and Rowan (1977) as quoted by Akbar et al (2012) stated that isomorphism has three consequences to the organization, (1) they link legitimated elements externally, not in efficiency, (2) they use external criteria or ceremonial to determine the value of the structural elements, and (3) reliance on external institutions keep reducing turbulence and maintaining stability.…”
Section: Institutional Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dalam konsep isomorfisma kompetitif, dikatakan bahwa ketika ada suatu cara yang lebih murah, lebih baik, atau lebih efisien dalam melakukan sesuatu, kekuatan kompetitif mendorong organisasi untuk menuju ke arah pendekatan baru tersebut. Sementara itu, dalam konsep isomorfisma institusional, pengaruh institusional tersebar melalui area organisasi yang disebut dengan medan organisasi, yang berarti bahwa organisasi-organisasi secara keseluruhan merupakan sebuah area yang diakui dari kehidupan institusional, yaitu pemasok kunci, sumberdaya dan pelanggan produk, ketergantungan peraturan, dan organisasi lain yang menyediakan layanan dan produk serupa (Erro dan Sánchez 2012). Isomorfisma struktural digambarkan sebagai sebuah konsekuensi penting dari proses kompetitif dan institusional.…”
Section: Tinjauan Pustaka Dan Perumusan Hipotesis Teori Institusionalunclassified
“…Isomorfisma struktural digambarkan sebagai sebuah konsekuensi penting dari proses kompetitif dan institusional. Akibatnya, organisasi tidak bersaing untuk mendapatkan sumber daya atau pelanggan tetapi untuk mendapatkan kekuasaan dan legitimasi, selain untuk kesejahteraan sosial dan hasil ekonomi (Dimaggio dan Powell 1983;Erro dan Sánchez 2012;Akbar et al 2012;Ahyaruddin dan Akbar 2016, 2018.…”
Section: Tinjauan Pustaka Dan Perumusan Hipotesis Teori Institusionalunclassified
“…It enables participants to exploit the recognised standing of the UN logo (Hughes and Wilkinson, 2001; Fritsch, 2008) and thus increase their reputation (Selvik, 2013). It is also used to enter new markets, expanding the customer portfolio (Garayar Erro and Calvo Sánchez, 2012; Arevalo and Aravind, 2011). Some empirical papers (Bennie et al , 2007; Perkins and Neumayer, 2010) show a positive relationship between UNGC adoption and the country’s intensity of foreign direct investment.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%