2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joining-up thinking: Loss in childbearing from inter-disciplinary perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The design of contextualized studies of why loss in childbearing is still a serious public health problem has recently been encouraged by “joining-up thinking” from multi-disciplinary perspectives [10]. The “thinking” highlights the importance of non-medical factors that may play a determinant role in understanding healthcare-seeking behaviors such as the gender aspects of decision-making and local perceptions of illness and treatment [11-16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design of contextualized studies of why loss in childbearing is still a serious public health problem has recently been encouraged by “joining-up thinking” from multi-disciplinary perspectives [10]. The “thinking” highlights the importance of non-medical factors that may play a determinant role in understanding healthcare-seeking behaviors such as the gender aspects of decision-making and local perceptions of illness and treatment [11-16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, perinatal deaths are common in SAMM, and in our original sample of 81 episodes of (pre-) eclampsia the perinatal death rate was 30% (Mooij et al 2015). This means long-term effects after SAMM arise not only due to persistent maternal illness but also because of the perinatal loss in childbearing (de Kok et al 2010;Mooij et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There is also a need to study how couples make family planning decisions after SAMM, and to what extent these decisions are shared. Women's social status within the household may diminish after SAMM, especially in case of perinatal loss (de Kok et al 2010;Storeng et al 2010), and this may further compromise her already limited reproductive health decision-making power. More studies are needed as well to evaluate strategies for involving men and increasing complication readiness and birth preparedness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%