2023
DOI: 10.1002/mp.16842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint AAPM Task Group 282/EFOMP Working Group Report: Breast dosimetry for standard and contrast‐enhanced mammography and breast tomosynthesis

Ioannis Sechopoulos,
David R. Dance,
John M. Boone
et al.

Abstract: Currently, there are multiple breast dosimetry estimation methods for mammography and its variants in use throughout the world. This fact alone introduces uncertainty, since it is often impossible to distinguish which model is internally used by a specific imaging system. In addition, all current models are hampered by various limitations, in terms of overly simplified models of the breast and its composition, as well as simplistic models of the imaging system. Many of these simplifications were necessary, for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In response to this, Hernandez et al (2015) and Caballo et al (2022) have developed two types of heterogeneous breast models, which do not include detailed structures and textures, to consider patient-based glandular distribution characteristics. And a new breast dosimetry protocol (Sechopoulos et al 2023) which adapted the heterogeneous breast phantoms of Caballo et al (2022) has been published.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to this, Hernandez et al (2015) and Caballo et al (2022) have developed two types of heterogeneous breast models, which do not include detailed structures and textures, to consider patient-based glandular distribution characteristics. And a new breast dosimetry protocol (Sechopoulos et al 2023) which adapted the heterogeneous breast phantoms of Caballo et al (2022) has been published.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%