2013 IEEE 14th Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/spawc.2013.6612087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint activity and data detection for machine to machine communication via Bayes Risk optimization

Abstract: Abstract-Performing joint detection of activity and data is a promising approach to reduce management overhead in Machineto-Machine communication. However, erroneous activity detection has severe impacts on the system performance. Estimating an active node or user erroneously to be inactive results in a loss of data. To optimally balance activity and data detection, we derive a novel joint activity and data detector that bases on the minimization of the Bayes Risk. The Bayes Risk detector allows to control err… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, we proposed to augment joint activity and data detection by taking the risk for erroneous activity detection into regard resulting in the so called Bayes-Risk MAP detector introduced in [6], [7]. This detector takes cost for an erroneous activity detection into account which is done via the two factors As a major result of [6], the ratio of costs Ω = CFa CFi steers the detector between being more liberal and decide more in favor of activity or to be more conservative and decide more in favor of inactivity.…”
Section: Table I Possible Outcomes For Activity Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To this end, we proposed to augment joint activity and data detection by taking the risk for erroneous activity detection into regard resulting in the so called Bayes-Risk MAP detector introduced in [6], [7]. This detector takes cost for an erroneous activity detection into account which is done via the two factors As a major result of [6], the ratio of costs Ω = CFa CFi steers the detector between being more liberal and decide more in favor of activity or to be more conservative and decide more in favor of inactivity.…”
Section: Table I Possible Outcomes For Activity Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability of the activity detection is crucial for the data-detection as erroneous activity detection strongly impacts the overall performance. In [6], [7] the authors have derived the Bayes-Risk detector for symbol-by-symbol joint activity and data detection. This detector allows to control the error rates with respect to activity detection by an additional risk parameter such that certain system dependent error rate requirements are met.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%