2014
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.159475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Analysis of Binomial and Continuous Traits with a Recursive Model: A Case Study Using Mortality and Litter Size of Pigs

Abstract: This work presents a model for the joint analysis of a binomial and a Gaussian trait using a recursive parametrization that leads to a computationally efficient implementation. The model is illustrated in an analysis of mortality and litter size in two breeds of Danish pigs, Landrace and Yorkshire. Available evidence suggests that mortality of piglets increased partly as a result of successful selection for total number of piglets born. In recent years there has been a need to decrease the incidence of mortali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(25 reference statements)
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Convergence was checked by the visual inspection of the chains and with the test of Raftery and Lewis (1992) . The models were compared based on the pseudo-log-marginal probability of the data ( Gelfand 1996 ; Varona and Sorensen 2014 ) by computing the logarithm of the Conditional Predictive Ordinate (LogCPO) calculated from the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samples. It was calculated as: where y -i is the vector of data with the ith datum (y i ) deleted, M k is the kth model and being Ns is the number of MCMC draws, is the jth draw from the posterior distribution of the parameters of the kth model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convergence was checked by the visual inspection of the chains and with the test of Raftery and Lewis (1992) . The models were compared based on the pseudo-log-marginal probability of the data ( Gelfand 1996 ; Varona and Sorensen 2014 ) by computing the logarithm of the Conditional Predictive Ordinate (LogCPO) calculated from the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samples. It was calculated as: where y -i is the vector of data with the ith datum (y i ) deleted, M k is the kth model and being Ns is the number of MCMC draws, is the jth draw from the posterior distribution of the parameters of the kth model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonnormality of at least one of the traits can cause a nonlinear relationship between them (Varona and Sorensen 2014). Survival is binomially distributed, although we assumed multivariate normality of birth weight and survival, but estimates of additive genetic correlations on the linear scale are expected to be equal to those on the underlying scale (Vinson et al 1976;Gianola 1982) and therefore not biased by the current procedure.…”
Section: Methodological Framework and Quantitative Genetic Aspects Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is an optimum phenotype, a maximum would imply a negative covariance between V E and fitness; i.e., families with small variance would have selective advantage if there is stabilizing selection, and correspondingly families with a large variance would have an advantage if there is disruptive or strong directional selection (Hill and Zhang 2004;Mulder et al 2007). Examples of nonlinear trait relationships include that between birth weight and survival of infants in humans in historic data when medical care was less optimized (Karn andPenrose 1951 in Schluter 1988), survival and size in house sparrows (Schluter and Smith 1986;Schluter 1988), and between litter size and birth weight in piglets (Varona and Sorensen 2014). These nonlinear relationships might be due in part to a nonnormality of at least one of the traits such as survival (binomial).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors make it difficult to obtain clear measurements of litter size in wild populations. A controlled laboratory environment is therefore necessary to measure genetic effects of litter size (Jinks and Broadhurst 1963;Roberts 1960;Bandy and Eisen 1984;Hoornbeek 1968;Peripato et al 2004;Gutiérrez et al 2006;Varona and Sorensen 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%