2013
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-13-1669-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint analysis of infrasound and seismic signals by cross wavelet transform: detection of Mt. Etna explosive activity

Abstract: The prompt detection of explosive volcanic activity is crucial since this kind of activity can release copious amounts of volcanic ash and gases into the atmosphere, causing severe dangers to aviation. In this work, we show how the joint analysis of seismic and infrasonic data by wavelet transform coherence (WTC) can be useful to detect explosive activity, significantly enhancing its recognition that is normally done by video cameras and thermal sensors. Indeed, the efficiency of these sensors can be reduced (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, because the eruption involves fluid-solid interactions, we conclude that the dipolar sources, likely distributed spatially, are dominant in our near field recordings. Similar correlations where found by Cannata et al (2013) studying paroxysms of Etna volcano. They found correlations over 70-75 per cent between the root mean square (RMS) of amplitudes of seismic and acoustic records, within a similar seismic frequency range (0.5-5.5 Hz) to our case, and in the near field also.…”
Section: O N C L U S I O N Ssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Furthermore, because the eruption involves fluid-solid interactions, we conclude that the dipolar sources, likely distributed spatially, are dominant in our near field recordings. Similar correlations where found by Cannata et al (2013) studying paroxysms of Etna volcano. They found correlations over 70-75 per cent between the root mean square (RMS) of amplitudes of seismic and acoustic records, within a similar seismic frequency range (0.5-5.5 Hz) to our case, and in the near field also.…”
Section: O N C L U S I O N Ssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A similar coherence analysis was for instance performed by Cannata et al (2013) using cross wavelet transform for detecting explosive activity at Etna volcano. The principal difference with the present study lies in the usage of stations much closer to the active vent (∼1-1.7 km) and the strong intensity of the explosive activity, the combination of which leads to high signal-to-noise ratio for both seismic and infrasonic records.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, unless a large number of band passes are systematically searched, there is the potential to miss narrowband correlations between seismic and infrasonic waveforms that are otherwise uncorrelated at other frequencies. A significant practical advantage is thus made by also working in the frequency domain and using coherence in addition to cross correlation (see also the papers by Sciotto et al [] and Cannata et al [], who use coherence and wavelet transform coherence, respectively). We use the coherence (magnitude‐squared coherence) between unfiltered seismic and acoustic waveforms: γwp2=|Swp|2SwwSpp,where S w w and S p p are the power spectra of vertical seismic velocity and acoustic pressure, respectively, and S w p is the cross spectrum.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%