2015
DOI: 10.1190/geo2014-0378.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Bayesian wavelet and well-path estimation in the impedance domain

Abstract: We addressed the problem of the well-to-seismic tie as a Bayesian inversion for the wavelet and well path in the impedance domain. The result of the joint inversion is a set of wavelets for multiple angle stacks, and a corresponding well path. The wavelet optimally links the impedance data along the well to the seismic data along the optimized well path in the seismic time domain. Starting with prior distribution for wavelet and well path, the method calculates the posterior distribution of conditioning the pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deterministic methods require direct measurements of the source wavefield or the use of the well log data (OLDENBURG;LEVY;WHITTALL, 1981;YILMAZ, 2000). Statistical methods estimate the wavelet from the seismic trace itself and require assumptions about the characteristics of the wavelet (BULAND; OMRE, 2003;LUNDSGAARD;KLEMM;CHERRETT, 2015). In this study we compare the quality of the well to seismic tie based on two different methods to estimate the wavelet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deterministic methods require direct measurements of the source wavefield or the use of the well log data (OLDENBURG;LEVY;WHITTALL, 1981;YILMAZ, 2000). Statistical methods estimate the wavelet from the seismic trace itself and require assumptions about the characteristics of the wavelet (BULAND; OMRE, 2003;LUNDSGAARD;KLEMM;CHERRETT, 2015). In this study we compare the quality of the well to seismic tie based on two different methods to estimate the wavelet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%