2012
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2011.110811.110939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Calibration of Transmitter and Receiver Impairments in Direct-Conversion Radio Architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, even in systems with a 20% tolerance for mis-identification receiving signals exceeding 20dB SNR, emitters need to have a linear gain imbalance separation of at least 0.15. While few publications indicate measured gain imbalance values for real systems, most prior works in IQ imbalance estimation and compensation use test values on the order of 0.05 [7], [10], [12], [14]- [17], indicating the gain imbalance values necessary to obtain even 80% accuracy are not practical in real systems. Narrowing the range of gain imbalance values included in the training set would likely help combat this problem.…”
Section: F Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, even in systems with a 20% tolerance for mis-identification receiving signals exceeding 20dB SNR, emitters need to have a linear gain imbalance separation of at least 0.15. While few publications indicate measured gain imbalance values for real systems, most prior works in IQ imbalance estimation and compensation use test values on the order of 0.05 [7], [10], [12], [14]- [17], indicating the gain imbalance values necessary to obtain even 80% accuracy are not practical in real systems. Narrowing the range of gain imbalance values included in the training set would likely help combat this problem.…”
Section: F Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the signal model described above, all data used in the following simulations was generated with the open-source gr-signal exciter module in GNURadio [13]. Though gain and phase imbalance values for real systems are not easily found, prior works in IQ imbalance estimation and compensation use test values ranging from 0.02 to 0.82 for absolute gain imbalance and from 2 • to 11.42 • for phase imbalance, with most works used test values on the orders of 0.05 and 5 • for gain and phase imbalance respectively [7], [10], [12], [14]- [17]. Therefore, QAM signals of orders 8, 16, 32, and 64 and PSK signals of orders 2, 4, 8, and 16 were simulated with linear gain imbalances between [-0.9, 0.9], uniformly distributed, and phase imbalances between [−10 • , 10 • ], uniformly distributed, in order to incorporate all possible offset values one might see in a real system.…”
Section: Dataset Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, performance degrades if some of the design conditions for optimal training sequence are violated, especially the one violates (b.1) resulting a large performance degradation. In addition, a tight lower bound for I-Q imbalance IRR is also shown, which is derived in [16].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, non-optimal training only results in a slight performance degradation in this aspect. A tight upper bound on dc offset errors is also given for verifying the performance [16].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method only compensates for the frequency-dependent I/Q imbalance at the TX. Hsu and Sheen [2] studied joint calibration methods for TX/RX RF impairments. They used a frequency offset (FO) method for joint TX/RX calibration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%