2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2920724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Joint Channel Estimation and Impulsive Noise Mitigation Method for OFDM Systems Using Sparse Bayesian Learning

Abstract: The impulsive noise can deteriorate sharply the performance of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems. In this paper, we propose a novel joint channel impulse response estimation and impulsive noise mitigation algorithm based on compressed sensing theory. In this algorithm, both the channel impulse response and the impulsive noise are treated as a joint sparse vector. Then, the sparse Bayesian learning framework is adopted to jointly estimate the channel impulse response, the impulsive noise… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VI methods approximate the exact Bayesian posterior distribution with a tractable variational density [26]- [29], while MC techniques obtain approximate samples from the Bayesian posterior distribution [30]- [32]. Among other applications to communications systems, Bayesian learning was studied for network allocation in [33]- [35], for massive MIMO detection in [36]- [38], for channel estimation in [39]- [41], for user identification in [42], and for multi user detection in [43], [44]. Extensions to Bayesian meta-learning have been investigated in [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VI methods approximate the exact Bayesian posterior distribution with a tractable variational density [26]- [29], while MC techniques obtain approximate samples from the Bayesian posterior distribution [30]- [32]. Among other applications to communications systems, Bayesian learning was studied for network allocation in [33]- [35], for massive MIMO detection in [36]- [38], for channel estimation in [39]- [41], for user identification in [42], and for multi user detection in [43], [44]. Extensions to Bayesian meta-learning have been investigated in [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper introduces the use of Bayesian meta-learning to enable both adaptation and monitoring for the tasks of demodulation and equalization. Unlike prior works that considered either frequentist meta-learning [6], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26] or Bayesian learning [40], [41], [42], [43], the proposed Bayesian meta-learning methodology enables both resource-efficient adaptation and a reliable quantification of uncertainty. To further improve the efficiency of Bayesian metalearning we propose the use of active meta-learning, which reduces the number of required meta-training data from previously received frames.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11], a novel joint channel impulse response estimation and impulsive noise mitigation algorithm based on compressed sensing theory is proposed. In this algorithm, both the channel impulse response and the impulsive noise are treated as a joint sparse vector.…”
Section: A R Fereydouni a Charmin* H Vahdati H Nasir Aghdammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis of the wavelet transform is based on two basic functions shown in Equation (11). In which they are called the mother wavelet function and the basic scale function, respectively [18].…”
Section: Wavelet Packet Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%